The uniformity-flexibility dilemma when comparing financial statements. The view of auditors, analysts and other users

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Companies spend a lot of time and money in preparing financial statements that are supposed to meet the information needs of 'users'. It is not surprising then that accounting literature and standard setters try to define the most important users of financial statements. However, the approach followed so far is rather axiomatic. More empirical research is necessary to identify who the users really are. This paper contributes to the accounting literature by exploring who the users of financial statements are using a unique set of responses from 455 users of financial statements of mainly Belgian listed companies. The results show that - in line with the previous research findings and the assumptions of standard setters - shareholders, investors and analysts are key users. Additionally however, suppliers, customers, consultants and competitors are also important users. Furthermore, frequent users are interested in financial statements of companies from different industries but less in the financial statements of companies located in different countries. Finally, almost 50% of the users spend less than 15 minutes in analysing a typical financial statement.
Translated title of the contributionHet uniformiteit-flexibiliteit dilemma bij de vergelijking van jaarrekening. Het standpunt van auditors, analisten en andere gebruikers.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)16-37
Number of pages22
JournalAccountancy & Bedrijfskunde
Volume30
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2010

Keywords

  • financial statements
  • users

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The uniformity-flexibility dilemma when comparing financial statements. The view of auditors, analysts and other users'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this