TY - JOUR
T1 - The way forward for assessing the human health safety of cosmetics in the EU: Proceedings of Workshop 2
AU - Rogiers, Vera
AU - Benfenati, Emilio
AU - Bernauer, Ulrike
AU - Bodin, Laurent
AU - Brown, Patience
AU - Cabaton, Nicolas
AU - Chaudhry, Qasim
AU - Coenraads, Pieter-Jan
AU - Corsini, Emanuela
AU - Dent, Matthew P
AU - Ellison, Corie
AU - Ezendam, Janine
AU - Gaffet, Eric
AU - Galli, Corrado Lodovico
AU - Katsanou, Effrosyni
AU - Koutsodimou, Aglaia
AU - Louro, Henriqueta
AU - Najjar, Abdulkarim
AU - Paini, Alicia
AU - Panteri, Eirini
AU - Rousselle, Christophe
AU - Sadekar, Nikaeta
AU - Schepky, Andreas
AU - Stepnik, Maciej
AU - Uter, Wolfgang
AU - Vanhaecke, Tamara
AU - von Goetz, Natalie
AU - Wijnhoven, Susan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2026/1/8
Y1 - 2026/1/8
N2 - Under the European Cosmetic Regulation, safety assessments of cosmetics and their ingredients must be conducted without the use of animals. This regulatory requirement poses a number of challenges, as validated alternative methods are only available for some of the toxicological endpoints that are typically considered in standard human health risk assessments. Despite significant progress since the ban in 2013, particularly in the development of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) for local and acute toxicity, and for mutagenicity/genotoxicity, there remains an urgent need for non-animal test methods to assess systemic toxicity, which often becomes evident after repeated or long-term exposure. Currently, no validated animal-free alternatives are available for assessing sub-acute, sub-chronic and chronic toxicity, carcinogenicity, developmental/reproductive toxicity, or for a major part of toxicokinetics. In response to these challenges, the Methodology Working Group of the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety organised a dedicated workshop in December 2024 to discuss advances in the application of Next Generation Risk Assessment (NGRA) as a strategic animal-free approach for the safety assessment of cosmetic ingredients. The workshop focused on a number of important key issues for the practical application of NAMs and NGRA, their regulatory acceptance and identification of possible (partial) solutions to overcome existing limitations.
AB - Under the European Cosmetic Regulation, safety assessments of cosmetics and their ingredients must be conducted without the use of animals. This regulatory requirement poses a number of challenges, as validated alternative methods are only available for some of the toxicological endpoints that are typically considered in standard human health risk assessments. Despite significant progress since the ban in 2013, particularly in the development of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) for local and acute toxicity, and for mutagenicity/genotoxicity, there remains an urgent need for non-animal test methods to assess systemic toxicity, which often becomes evident after repeated or long-term exposure. Currently, no validated animal-free alternatives are available for assessing sub-acute, sub-chronic and chronic toxicity, carcinogenicity, developmental/reproductive toxicity, or for a major part of toxicokinetics. In response to these challenges, the Methodology Working Group of the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety organised a dedicated workshop in December 2024 to discuss advances in the application of Next Generation Risk Assessment (NGRA) as a strategic animal-free approach for the safety assessment of cosmetic ingredients. The workshop focused on a number of important key issues for the practical application of NAMs and NGRA, their regulatory acceptance and identification of possible (partial) solutions to overcome existing limitations.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105027766664
U2 - 10.1007/s00204-025-04275-x
DO - 10.1007/s00204-025-04275-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 41501514
SN - 0340-5761
VL - 100
SP - 1637
EP - 1655
JO - Archives of Toxicology
JF - Archives of Toxicology
ER -