Abstract
BACKGROUND: Misconceptions about ADHD stigmatize affected people, reduce credibility of providers, and prevent/delay treatment. To challenge misconceptions, we curated findings with strong evidence base.
METHODS: We reviewed studies with more than 2,000 participants or meta-analyses from five or more studies or 2,000 or more participants. We excluded meta-analyses that did not assess publication bias, except for meta-analyses of prevalence. For network meta-analyses we required comparison adjusted funnel plots. We excluded treatment studies with waiting-list or treatment as usual controls. From this literature, we extracted evidence-based assertions about the disorder.
RESULTS: We generated 208 empirically supported statements about ADHD. The status of the included statements as empirically supported is approved by 79 authors from 27 countries and 6 continents. The contents of the manuscript are endorsed by 362 people who have read this document and agree with its contents.
CONCLUSIONS: Many findings in ADHD are supported by meta-analysis. These allow for firm statements about the nature, course, outcome causes, and treatments for disorders that are useful for reducing misconceptions and stigma.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 789-818 |
| Number of pages | 30 |
| Journal | Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews |
| Volume | 128 |
| Early online date | 4 Feb 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.Keywords
- ADHD
- brain
- diagnosis
- genetics
- outcome
- treatment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver