Three-dimensional intracardiac echocardiography for left atrial appendage sizing and percutaneous occlusion guidance

Domenico G Della Rocca, Michele Magnocavallo, Carola Gianni, Sanghamitra Mohanty, Amin Al-Ahmad, Mohamed Bassiouny, Marialessia Denora, Vincenzo Mirco La Fazia, Carlo Lavalle, Gerald J Gallinghouse, Pasquale Santangeli, Marco Polselli, Andrea Sarkozy, Giampaolo Vetta, Adnan Ahmed, Javier E Sanchez, Luigi Pannone, Gian-Battista Chierchia, David R Tschopp, Carlo De AsmundisLuigi Di Biase, Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy, David J Burkhardt, Rodney P Horton, Andrea Natale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: Left atrial appendage (LAA) imaging is critical during percutaneous occlusion procedures. 3D-intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) features direct visualization of LAA from multiple cross-sectional planes at a time. We aimed at reporting procedural success of 3D-ICE-guided LAA occlusion and the correlation between pre-procedural transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and intraprocedural 3D-ICE for LAA sizing. Methods and results: Among 274 patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) with a Watchman FLX, periprocedural ICE guidance was achieved via a commercially available 2D-ICE catheter (220 patients) or a novel (NUVISION™) 3D-ICE one (54 patients). Primary endpoint was a composite of procedural success and LAA sealing at follow-up TEE. Secondary endpoint was a composite of periprocedural device recapture/resizing plus presence of leaks ≥ 3amm at follow-up TEE. 3D-ICE measurements of maximum landing zone correlated highly with pre-procedural TEE reference values [Pearson's: 0.94; P < 0.001; bias:-0.06 (-2.39, 2.27)]. The agreement between 3D-ICE-based device selection and final device size was 96.3% vs. 79.1% with 2D-ICE (P = 0.005). The incidence of the primary endpoint was 98.1% with 3D-ICE and 97.3% with 2D-ICE (P = 0.99). 2D-ICE patients had a trend towards a higher incidence of periprocedural device recapture/redeployment (31.5% vs. 44.5%; P = 0.09). The secondary endpoint occurred in 31.5% of 3D-ICE patients vs. 45.9% of 2D-ICE ones (P = 0.065). Conclusion: Intracardiac echocardiography-guided LAAO showed a very high success, with no major adverse events. A very high level of agreement for LAA sizing was found between pre-procedural TEE and periprocedural 3D-ICE. 3D-ICE performed significantly better than 2D-ICE for FLX size selection and may provide better guidance during device deployment.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbereuae010
Number of pages10
JournalEuropace
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Keywords

  • FLX
  • Intracardiac echocardiography
  • Left atrial appendage
  • Stroke
  • Thromboembolism
  • Transoesophageal echocardiography
  • Watchman
  • article
  • cerebrovascular accident
  • cohort analysis
  • complication
  • controlled study
  • female
  • follow up
  • heart atrium appendage
  • human
  • incidence
  • intracardiac echocardiography
  • left atrial appendage closure
  • left atrial appendage closure device
  • major clinical study
  • male
  • reference value
  • thromboembolism
  • transesophageal echocardiography

Cite this