Abstract
The international business literature has suggested various linkages between multinationality (M) and performance (P). A number of authors have recently put forward an S-shaped curve, allegedly describing a generalized MP relationship. However, internalization theory, in line with Buckley and Casson (Buckley, P.J., & Casson M. (1976). The future of the multinational enterprise. Macmillan: London) and Hennart (Hennart, J. F. (1982). A theory of multinational enterprise. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press; Hennart, J. F. (2007). The theoretical rationale for a multinationality-performance relationship, Management International Review, 47(3), 423-452), challenges the concept itself of such a generalized relationship between these two parameters. This paper adopts an internalization theory perspective, meant to improve the design of MP studies, and cautions against assuming too quickly a generalized MP relationship. In line with internalization theory, we argue that firm-level performance depends primarily on the characteristics of the companies' firm specific advantages (FSAs) rather than on their degree of multinationality. We propose triple-testing the quality of MP studies, by assessing how well they address the various challenges related to conceptualizing and measuring M, P and the MP relationship itself.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 265-275 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | International Business Review |
Volume | 18 |
Issue number | 3 |
Publication status | Published - 2009 |
Keywords
- Firm-specific advantage
- Internalization
- MP relationship
- Multinationality
- Performance
- S-curve