Under blood pressure – differentiated versus undifferentiated marketing to increase blood donations

Larissa M. Sundermann, Silke Boenigk, Jurgen Willems

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite strong evidence in current marketing theory and practice that a differentiated marketing approach increases recruitment success, blood services worldwide often use undifferentiated marketing strategies to address new blood donors. Relying on the assumption that differentiated marketing is highly promising; the authors developed an online experiment among 838 participants who had not donated blood during the past 10 years. The experiment tested the effects of a differentiated in comparison to an undifferentiated marketing campaign on three marketing outcomes: (1) awareness, (2) intention, and (3) behavioral enactment. Surprisingly and in contrast with most marketing studies in the for-profit context, the results of the blood donation experiment suggest that differentiated marketing is not more effective than undifferentiated marketing. This finding has important implications for marketing strategies and actions of blood services.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)321-340
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2017

Keywords

  • Blood donor management
  • Blood donor recruitment
  • Differentiated marketing
  • Experiment
  • Target groups

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Under blood pressure – differentiated versus undifferentiated marketing to increase blood donations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this