Validation of EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing directly from positive blood cultures in a non-automated lab setting

Gregory Strubbe, Eveline Van Honacker, Stien Vandendriessche, Anne-Sophie Messiaen, Bruno Verhasselt, Jerina Boelens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To speed up antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) proposed rapid AST (RAST), a disk diffusion method to be read after 4, 6 and 8 hours of incubation. We investigated the feasibility of implementation of RAST in a non-automated lab setting.

MATERIALS & METHODS: To this end, reference strains as well as a variety of clinical and resistant strains were used to spike sterile hemocultures (BioMérieux BACT/ALERT 3D® and Becton Dickinson BACTEC FX® systems), followed by RAST in comparison to classical long-incubation AST.

RESULTS & CONCLUSION: Our results with reference strains show that reading RAST after 4 hours is frequently too soon to obtain clinical results, and that Streptococcus pneumoniae reference strain did yield readable inhibition zones in RAST when harvested from BioMérieux BACT/ALERT 3D® bottle cultures. In a wider panel of strains, Gram positives RAST results were very similar to standard AST, while with Gram negative species errors were more frequently observed, limiting clinical implementation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)319-326
Number of pages8
JournalActa Clinica Belgica
Volume79
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Belgian Society of Internal Medicine and Royal Belgian Society of Laboratory Medicine (2024).

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods
  • Blood Culture/methods
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing directly from positive blood cultures in a non-automated lab setting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this