“What motivates you doesn't motivate me”: Individual differences in the need satisfaction – motivation relationship of Romanian volunteers

Simona Mihaela Haivas, Joeri Hofmans, Roland Pepermans

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    33 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The present study examines individual differences in the relationship between two core concepts of the self determination theory (SDT), namely satisfaction with the autonomy, competence and relatedness need and motivation (autonomous vs. controlled). Based on the values component of SDT we hypothesized at least two different subpopulations with different need satisfaction - motivation patterns. Data from 349 Romanian volunteers revealed two groups (or subpopulations) of volunteers to be distinguished, supporting our hypothesis. For the first and largest group, the pattern is in line with the SDT assumption that satisfaction of the autonomy and competence need has an effect on the autonomous forms of motivation. This group is in line with people endorsing intrinsic values. The second group of volunteers, however, revealed that satisfaction with the relatedness need links up with the controlled forms of motivation, and satisfaction of autonomy and competence needs does not predict autonomous motivation. This group is expected to favor extrinsic values. Both relationship patterns were further linked to work engagement and intention to quit, in order to shed light on the practical importance of the observed differences
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)326-343
    Number of pages18
    JournalApplied Psychology
    Volume63
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Keywords

    • volunteers
    • Romania
    • self determination theory
    • individual differences
    • motivation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of '“What motivates you doesn't motivate me”: Individual differences in the need satisfaction – motivation relationship of Romanian volunteers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this