Why pairwise comparison methods may fail in MCDM rankings

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference paper

    Abstract

    This article is based on previous author's article on the correct way for ranking alternatives in a Multi-criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) by combining additively ranks or scores evaluated against a dimensionless scale, common to all criteria. A straightforward but robust Weighed-Sum Procedure (WSP) is presented here. MCDM methodologies based on pair-wise comparison methods are on the contrary not providing the correct rankings in many practical situations. The roots of the observed failures are made clearer by means of a simple example for the well-known Promethee method.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of OR 2011, Int. Conference on Operations Research, Zürich, Switzerland, August 30 to September 2, 2011
    EditorsD. Klatte, H.g. Lüthi, K. Schmedder
    PublisherSpringer
    Pages97-102
    Number of pages6
    Volume1
    ISBN (Print)978-3-642-29209-5
    Publication statusPublished - 31 Aug 2012
    EventInternational Conference on Operations Research, OR 2011 - Zurich, Switzerland
    Duration: 30 Aug 20112 Sept 2011

    Publication series

    NameOperations Research Proceedings
    Number1

    Conference

    ConferenceInternational Conference on Operations Research, OR 2011
    Country/TerritorySwitzerland
    CityZurich
    Period30/08/112/09/11

    Bibliographical note

    D. Klatte; H.G. Lüthi; K. Schmedder

    Keywords

    • Multicriteria Decision Making
    • Pair-wise comparisons
    • anomalies
    • Promethee

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Why pairwise comparison methods may fail in MCDM rankings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this