Abstract
In two recently published judgments of the Federal Supreme Court in Germany dating June 23rd, 2004 (IV ZR130/03) and September 29, 2004 (IV ZR 233/03) the assessment of tinnitus in private accident insurance and particularly the exclusion clause § 2 Abs. 4 AUB 88 has been newly defined. This exclusion clause is still valid according to the actual jurisdiction in the case a tinnitus is asserted following an accident without any organic (physical) damage. In this case tinnitus has to be regarded as mental (psychic) reaction in the meaning of paragraph 2 AUB. According to the actual jurisdiction the compensation of tinnitus could be possible, when as physical underlying reason a proved harm in the field of the inner ear or the auditory pathway is found, which can be traced back to the accident according to the rules of causality. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart.
| Translated title of the contribution | Assessment of tinnitus in private accident insurance |
|---|---|
| Original language | German |
| Pages (from-to) | 204-208 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Laryngo- Rhino- Otologie |
| Volume | 85 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2006 |
Keywords
- tinnitus
- medico-legal expertise
- compensation
- private accident insurance