TY - JOUR
T1 - A breast sharing technique using the pedicled IMAP flap for delayed breast reconstruction and contralateral symmetrising mammaplasty
T2 - A case series and evolution of the surgical technique in selected patients
AU - Hamdi, Moustapha
AU - Waked, Karl
AU - De Baerdemaeker, Randy
AU - Szychta, Pawel
AU - Ramaut, Lisa
AU - Giunta, Gabriele
AU - Nistor, Alexandru
N1 - Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - INTRODUCTION: The 'breast-sharing' procedure uses the disposable tissue as a flap to reconstruct the post-mastectomy defect. This enables simultaneous breast reconstruction and contralateral symmetrisation without additional donor site morbidity. However, controversies related to the oncological safety of this procedure have prevented its widespread uptake. We aim to present this technique based on a pedicled internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) flap and discuss its technical feasibility and oncological safety.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 2013 and May 2022, a series of 10 consecutive patients underwent a breast-sharing procedure using the pedicled IMAP flap for breast reconstruction. Clinical and surgical aspects of the breast-sharing procedure were analysed.RESULTS: In all the cases, the breast-sharing technique allowed for simultaneous breast reconstruction and contralateral breast symmetrisation. Immediate complications included two total venous congestions and one hematoma. Three flaps had distal flap congestion. One flap required debridement and local flap reconstruction. All flaps required fat grafting during the secondary procedures to improve breast symmetry. With an average follow-up of 5.6 years, there was no evidence of recurrent disease. All patients were satisfied to very satisfied with the aesthetic outcome of this reconstructive option.CONCLUSIONS: The breast-sharing technique based on the IMAP flap combines breast reconstruction and contralateral symmetrisation with good aesthetic outcomes in selected patients. The flap has a high complication rate related to venous drainage. Flap design modification and using indocyanine green imaging may reduce venous congestion. A secondary venous micro-anastomosis at the axilla is highly recommended for persistent flap congestion. The reported incidence of contralateral breast cancer is low, and thus, the residual tissue obtained from the contralateral breast mammaplasty can be safely used for breast reconstruction.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
AB - INTRODUCTION: The 'breast-sharing' procedure uses the disposable tissue as a flap to reconstruct the post-mastectomy defect. This enables simultaneous breast reconstruction and contralateral symmetrisation without additional donor site morbidity. However, controversies related to the oncological safety of this procedure have prevented its widespread uptake. We aim to present this technique based on a pedicled internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) flap and discuss its technical feasibility and oncological safety.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 2013 and May 2022, a series of 10 consecutive patients underwent a breast-sharing procedure using the pedicled IMAP flap for breast reconstruction. Clinical and surgical aspects of the breast-sharing procedure were analysed.RESULTS: In all the cases, the breast-sharing technique allowed for simultaneous breast reconstruction and contralateral breast symmetrisation. Immediate complications included two total venous congestions and one hematoma. Three flaps had distal flap congestion. One flap required debridement and local flap reconstruction. All flaps required fat grafting during the secondary procedures to improve breast symmetry. With an average follow-up of 5.6 years, there was no evidence of recurrent disease. All patients were satisfied to very satisfied with the aesthetic outcome of this reconstructive option.CONCLUSIONS: The breast-sharing technique based on the IMAP flap combines breast reconstruction and contralateral symmetrisation with good aesthetic outcomes in selected patients. The flap has a high complication rate related to venous drainage. Flap design modification and using indocyanine green imaging may reduce venous congestion. A secondary venous micro-anastomosis at the axilla is highly recommended for persistent flap congestion. The reported incidence of contralateral breast cancer is low, and thus, the residual tissue obtained from the contralateral breast mammaplasty can be safely used for breast reconstruction.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
KW - Humans
KW - Female
KW - Mammaplasty/methods
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Perforator Flap
KW - Breast Neoplasms/surgery
KW - Adult
KW - Mastectomy/methods
KW - Patient Satisfaction
KW - Postoperative Complications/epidemiology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85208111637&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.087
DO - 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.087
M3 - Article
C2 - 39504726
VL - 99
SP - 566
EP - 576
JO - Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
JF - Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
SN - 1748-6815
ER -