Oussama Atoui, Azer Maazoun, Georgios Kechagiadakis, Bachir Belkassem, David Lecompte, Lincy Pyl

Onderzoeksoutput: Conference paperResearch

12 Downloads (Pure)


This work is a part of a larger research effort to better understand the combined effect of the blast wave and fragment impacts following the detonation of a shrapnel bomb. It is known that the time interval Δt, which represents the difference in arrival time between the blast wave front and the fragment at the position of a given target object, has a significant influence on its response mode. This paper presents insights into the establishment of a laboratory scale technique to generate a combined blast loading and single or multiple projectile impacts on a target. The objective of the set-up is to control the time interval Δt to a certain extent so that the different response modes of the tested structures can be investigated. In order to reduce the complexity associated with the random nature of the shrapnel, steel ball bearings are used to simulate the projected fragments. They are embedded in a solid explosive charge, which is detonated at the entrance of an explosive driven shock tube. The experimental work demonstrates that it is possible to control the flight path of a single projectile inside the tube when aiming at a target positioned at its exit. The set-up guarantees the generation of a well-controlled planar blast wave characterized by its peak pressure, impulse and blast wave arrival time at the exit of the tube. The influence of the mass of the charge and the diameter of the projectile on its velocity shows that for the same charge mass, the time interval increases with increasing projectile diameter.
Originele taal-2English
TitelThe 6th International Conference on Protective Structures (ICPS6)
SubtitelThe 6th International Conference on Protective Structures (ICPS6)
Aantal pagina's16
StatusUnpublished - 14 mei 2023
Evenement6th International Conference on Protective Structures - Auburn University, Auburn, United States
Duur: 14 mei 202317 mei 2023
Congresnummer: 6th


Conference6th International Conference on Protective Structures
Verkorte titelICPS6
Land/RegioUnited States
Internet adres

Bibliografische nota

1. Explosive Violence Monitor: (2020). Available online: https://aoav.org.uk/2021/explosive-violence-in-2020/ (accessed on 21 March 2022).
2. Improvised Explosive Device (IED) Monitor. Available online: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/IEDMonitor-Report-for-web-final.pdf (accessed on 21 March 2022).
3. Marchand, K.A.; Vargas, M.; Nixon, J.D (1992) The Synergistic Effects of Combined Blast and Fragment Loadings. Technical Report; Southwest Research Inst: San Antonio, TX, USA.
4. Kong, X.S.; Wu, W.G.; Li, J.; Chen, P.; Liu, F (2013) Experimental and Numerical Investigation on a Multi-Layer Protective Structure under the Synergistic Effect of Blast and Fragment Loadings. International Journal of Impact Engineering 65:146–162.
5. Gotts, P (2016) International ballistic and blast specifications and standards. Lightweight Ballistic Composites 115–156.
6. Xie, W.; Zhang, W.; Kuang, N.; Li, D.; Huang, W.; Gao, Y.; Ye, N.; Guo, L.; Ren, P (2016) Experimental investigation of normal and oblique impacts on CFRPs by high velocity steel sphere. Composite Part B Engineering 99: 483–493.
7. Lozano, E. (2016) Design and Analysis of a Personnel Blast Shield for Different Explosives Applications; Colorado School of Mines, Colorado, USA.
8. Nurick, G.; Martin, J. (1989) Deformation of thin plates subjected to impulsive loading—A review Part II: Experimental studies. International Journal of Impact Engineering 8: 171–186.
9. Maazoun, A.; Belkassem, B.; Reymen, B.; Matthys, S.; Vantomme, J.; Lecompte, D (2018) Blast response of RC slabs with externally bonded reinforcement: Experimental and analytical verification. Composite Structures 200: 246–257.
10. Zhu, W.; Huang, G.; Liu, H.; Lai, W.; bin Bian, X.; Shan F.S (2020) Experimental and numerical investigation of a hollow cylindrical water based barrier against internal blast induced fragment loading. International Journal of Impact Engineering 138: 103-145.
11. Grisaro, H (2016) Towards a better understanding of the response of RC barriers to combined loading of blast and fragments. In Proceedings of the 11th fib International PhD Symposium in Civil Engineering, Tokyo, Japan.
12. Zhang, C.; Cheng, Y.; Zhang, P.; Duan, X.; Liu, J.; Li, Y (2017) Numerical investigation of the response of I-core sandwich panels subjected to combined blast and fragment loading. Engineering Structures 151: 459–471.
13. Cai, S.; Liu, J.; Zhang, P.; Li, C.; Cheng, Y.; Chen, C (2021) Experimental study on failure mechanisms of sandwich panels with multi-layered aluminum foam/UHMWPE laminate core under combined blast and fragments loading. Thin-Walled Structures 159.
14. Grisaro, H.Y.; Dancygier, A.N. (2021) Dynamic Response of RC Elements Subjected to Combined Loading of Blast and Fragments. Engineering Structures 147.
15. Nystrom, U.; Gylltoft, K (2009) Numerical studies of the combined effects of blast and fragment loading. International Journal of Impact Engineering 36: 995–1005.
16. Zhang, C.; Gholipour, G.; Mousavi, A.A (2019) Nonlinear dynamic behavior of simply-supported RC beams subjected to combined impact-blast loading. Engineering Structures 181: 124–142.
17. Li, Y.; Chen, Z.; Ren, X.; Tao, R.; Gao, R.; Fang, D (2020) Experimental and numerical study on damage mode of RC slabs under combined blast and fragment loading. International Journal of Impact Engineering 142: 1–11.
18. Li, L.; Zhang, Q.C.; Zhang, R.; Wang, X.; Zhao, Z.Y.; He, S.Y.; Han, B.; Lu, T.J (2019) A laboratory experimental technique for simulating combined blast and impact loading. International Journal of Impact Engineering 134.
19. Qi, R.; Langdon, G.S.; Cloete, T.J.; Yuen, S.C.K (2020) Behaviour of a blast-driven ball bearing embedded in rear detonated cylindrical explosive. International Journal of Impact Engineering 146.
20. Mellen, P.; Shanahan, C.; Bennett, T (2019) Blast and fragmentation loading indicative of a VBIED surrogate for structural panel response analysis. International Journal of Impact Engineering 126: 172–184.
21. Louar, M.; Belkassem, B.; Ousji, H.; Spranghers, K.; Kakogiannis, D.; Pyl, L.,; Vantomme, J. (2015) Explosive driven shock tube loading of aluminium plates: Experimental study. International Journal of Impact Engineering 86: 111–123.
22. PCB Dynamic Pressure Sensors for High Frequency Measurements. Available online: https://www.pcb.com/Contentstore/MktgContent/LinkedDocuments/Pressure/TM-PRS-113B-102B_lowres.pdf (accessed on 21 March 2022).
23. Moumen, A.; Grossen, J.; Ndindabahizi, I.; Gallant, J.; Hendrick, P (2020) Visualization and Analysis of Muzzle Flow Fields Using the Background-Oriented Schlieren Technique. Journal of Visualization 23: 409–423.
24. Atoui, O.; Lecompte, D.; Belkassem, B (2022) Tests Showing the Projectile Flight Trajectory of 5, 7 and 8 mm Diameter Steel Spheres Attached to Either a Detonator or a Rear Detonated C4 Spherical Explosive Charge.
25. Robbe, C.; Nsiampa, N.; Oukara, A.; Papy (2014) A Quantification of the uncertainties of high-speed camera measurements. International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering 5.
26. Robbe, C.; Nsiampa, N.; Papy, A.; Oukara (2012) A Practical considerations for using high-speed camera to measure dynamic deformation occurring at the impact of a kinetic energy non-lethal weapon projectile on ballistic simulant. In Proceedings of the Personal Armor System Symposium (PASS) Conference Proceedings, Nuremberg, Germany.



Citeer dit