A note on using centroid weights in additive multi-criteria decision analysis

Pierre Kunsch, Alessio Ishizaka

Onderzoeksoutput: Articlepeer review

2 Citaten (Scopus)

Samenvatting

In this short communication, the authors challenge the comparison experiments made by several authors regarding the performances of surrogate weights frequently used in additive multicriteria decision analysis. Statistical tests compare the rankings obtained, either with random ‘true weights’ from a given weight simplex, or with the considered surrogate techniques. It is shown that the performance ranking of the surrogate techniques entirely depends on the way the weight simplex is defined. As an example, the rank-order-centroid weights, often found in this way to be the most performant ones, are only first-ranked when a point-allocation elicitation approach is adopted.
Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)391-393
Aantal pagina's3
TijdschriftEuropean Journal of Operational Research
Volume277
Nummer van het tijdschrift1
DOI's
StatusPublished - 16 aug 2019

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'A note on using centroid weights in additive multi-criteria decision analysis'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit