TY - JOUR
T1 - A systematic review on costs and cost-effectiveness of screening and prevention of type 2 diabetes in women with prior gestational diabetes
T2 - Exploring uncharted territory
AU - Werbrouck, Amber
AU - Schmidt, Masja
AU - Putman, Koen
AU - Benhalima, Katrien
AU - Verhaeghe, Nick
AU - Annemans, Lieven
AU - Simoens, Steven
N1 - Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - AIMS: Women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are more likely to develop type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as compared to women with normoglycemic pregnancies. This study aims to explore the literature on cost(-effectiveness) of screening and prevention of T2DM in women with prior GDM.METHODS: Five databases were systematically searched, inclusion criteria were: (1) women with (prior) GDM; (2) post-partum screening or prevention of T2DM; and (3) health-economic evaluations. No year limits were applied. English, Dutch, French or German publications were included. Quality was assessed using the Consensus Health Economic Criteria checklist.RESULTS: Two cost-effectiveness analyses and two cost analyses were found. One study evaluated nine screening strategies. Three studies evaluated one prevention strategy each: intensive diet and behavioural modification; annual counseling; and an annual dietary consultation. Methodological quality was poor. Perspectives were unclear, time horizons were too short, and no incremental analyses were performed.CONCLUSION: An oral glucose tolerance test per three years leads to the lowest cost per case detected, and prevention is potentially cost-effective or cost-saving. More health economic evaluations are needed that compare all relevant alternatives, including 'doing nothing'.
AB - AIMS: Women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are more likely to develop type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as compared to women with normoglycemic pregnancies. This study aims to explore the literature on cost(-effectiveness) of screening and prevention of T2DM in women with prior GDM.METHODS: Five databases were systematically searched, inclusion criteria were: (1) women with (prior) GDM; (2) post-partum screening or prevention of T2DM; and (3) health-economic evaluations. No year limits were applied. English, Dutch, French or German publications were included. Quality was assessed using the Consensus Health Economic Criteria checklist.RESULTS: Two cost-effectiveness analyses and two cost analyses were found. One study evaluated nine screening strategies. Three studies evaluated one prevention strategy each: intensive diet and behavioural modification; annual counseling; and an annual dietary consultation. Methodological quality was poor. Perspectives were unclear, time horizons were too short, and no incremental analyses were performed.CONCLUSION: An oral glucose tolerance test per three years leads to the lowest cost per case detected, and prevention is potentially cost-effective or cost-saving. More health economic evaluations are needed that compare all relevant alternatives, including 'doing nothing'.
KW - Gestational diabetes mellitus
KW - Health economics
KW - Prevention
KW - Systematic review
KW - Type 2 diabetes mellitus
KW - Pregnancy
KW - Mass Screening
KW - Diabetes, Gestational/economics
KW - Humans
KW - Female
KW - Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods
KW - Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/pathology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058375480&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.11.012
DO - 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.11.012
M3 - Scientific review
C2 - 30529576
SN - 0168-8227
VL - 147
SP - 138
EP - 148
JO - Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
JF - Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
ER -