TY - JOUR
T1 - Alzheimer's disease and driving
T2 - review of the literature and consensus guideline from Belgian dementia experts and the Belgian road safety institute endorsed by the Belgian Medical Association
AU - Versijpt, Jan
AU - Tant, Mark
AU - Beyer, Ingo
AU - Bier, Jean-Christophe
AU - Cras, Patrick
AU - De Deyn, Peter P
AU - De Wit, Patrick
AU - Deryck, Olivier
AU - Hanseeuw, Bernard
AU - Lambert, Margareta
AU - Lemper, Jean-Claude
AU - Mormont, Eric
AU - Petrovic, Mirko
AU - Picard, Gaetane
AU - Salmon, Eric
AU - Segers, Kurt
AU - Sieben, Anne
AU - Thiery, Evert
AU - Tournoy, Jos
AU - Vandewoude, Maurits
AU - Ventura, Manfredi
AU - Verschraegen, Jurn
AU - Engelborghs, Sebastiaan
AU - Goffin, Tom
AU - Deneyer, Michel
AU - Ivanoiu, Adrian
PY - 2017/12
Y1 - 2017/12
N2 - Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a highly prevalent condition and its prevalence is expected to further increase due to the aging of the general population. It is obvious that the diagnosis of AD has implications for driving. Finally, driving discussions are also emotionally charged because driving is associated with independence and personal identity. However, it is not clear how to implement this in clinical practice and the Belgian law on driving is rather vague in its referral to neurodegenerative brain diseases in general nor does it provide clear-cut instructions for dementia or AD compared to for example driving for patients with epilepsy and as such does not prove to be very helpful. The present article reviews what is known from both literature and existing guidelines and proposes a consensus recommendation tailored to the Belgian situation agreed by both AD experts and the Belgian Road Safety Institute endorsed by the Belgian Medical Association. It is concluded that the decision about driving fitness should be considered as a dynamic process where the driving fitness is assessed and discussed early after diagnosis and closely monitored by the treating physician. The diagnosis of AD on itself definitely does not imply the immediate and full revocation of a driving license nor does it implicate a necessary referral for a formal on-road driving assessment. There is no evidence to recommend a reduced exposure or a mandatory co-pilot. A MMSE-based framework to trichotomise AD patients as safe, indeterminate or unsafe is presented. The final decision on driving fitness can only be made after careful history taking and clinical examination, neuropsychological, functional and behavioral evaluation and, only for selected cases, a formal assessment of driving performance.
AB - Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a highly prevalent condition and its prevalence is expected to further increase due to the aging of the general population. It is obvious that the diagnosis of AD has implications for driving. Finally, driving discussions are also emotionally charged because driving is associated with independence and personal identity. However, it is not clear how to implement this in clinical practice and the Belgian law on driving is rather vague in its referral to neurodegenerative brain diseases in general nor does it provide clear-cut instructions for dementia or AD compared to for example driving for patients with epilepsy and as such does not prove to be very helpful. The present article reviews what is known from both literature and existing guidelines and proposes a consensus recommendation tailored to the Belgian situation agreed by both AD experts and the Belgian Road Safety Institute endorsed by the Belgian Medical Association. It is concluded that the decision about driving fitness should be considered as a dynamic process where the driving fitness is assessed and discussed early after diagnosis and closely monitored by the treating physician. The diagnosis of AD on itself definitely does not imply the immediate and full revocation of a driving license nor does it implicate a necessary referral for a formal on-road driving assessment. There is no evidence to recommend a reduced exposure or a mandatory co-pilot. A MMSE-based framework to trichotomise AD patients as safe, indeterminate or unsafe is presented. The final decision on driving fitness can only be made after careful history taking and clinical examination, neuropsychological, functional and behavioral evaluation and, only for selected cases, a formal assessment of driving performance.
KW - Journal Article
KW - Alzheimer
KW - disease
KW - review of the literature
KW - consensus guideline
KW - Belgian Medical Association
KW - Alzheimer’s disease
KW - Neurodegeneration
KW - Driving
KW - Dementia
KW - Behavior/physiology
KW - Guidelines as Topic
KW - Humans
KW - Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis
KW - Neuropsychological Tests
KW - Belgium
KW - Physical Examination
KW - Automobile Driving/legislation & jurisprudence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030658495&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s13760-017-0840-5
DO - 10.1007/s13760-017-0840-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 28983881
SN - 0300-9009
VL - 117
SP - 811
EP - 819
JO - Acta Neurologica Belgica
JF - Acta Neurologica Belgica
IS - 4
ER -