Neutralité permanente, interprétations mutantes: La neutralité belge à travers trois traités de juristes

Onderzoeksoutput: Articlepeer review

1 Citaat (Scopus)

Samenvatting

The permanent neutrality imposed on Belgium by the great powers (1830-1839) seems a precursor of a system of mandatory arbitration and the outlawing of war. At least, this image transpires in the writings of Ernest Nys (1903) and Edouard Descamps (1902), prominent voices of the ‘Gentle Civilizer of Nations’. Sixty years earlier, geopolitical circumstance, state practice and classical law of nations doctrine had brought Wilhelm Arendt (1845) to a more prudent point of view. The confrontation of both strands in doctrine with Belgian policy shows a complex sui generis combination of pragmatism and genuine fear of the guarantors’ wrath.
Vertaalde titel van de bijdrageChanging interpretations of Belgium's permanent neutrality in three legal treatises: The slidings of Nineteenth Century Belgian Doctrine
Originele taal-2French
Pagina's (van-tot)188-214
Aantal pagina's27
TijdschriftRevue d'Histoire du Droit
Volume86
Nummer van het tijdschrift1-2
Vroegere onlinedatum1 jun 2018
DOI's
StatusPublished - 29 jun 2018

Bibliografische nota

How is it possible that this was classified as "non-peer reviewed ???????" (The "TRG" is on the Web of Science)

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Neutralité permanente, interprétations mutantes: La neutralité belge à travers trois traités de juristes'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit