Combining treat-to-target principles and shared decision-making: International expert consensus-based recommendations with a novel concept for minimal disease activity criteria in atopic dermatitis

Jonathan I Silverberg, Melinda Gooderham, Norito Katoh, Valeria Aoki, Andrew E Pink, Yousef Binamer, Marius Rademaker, Daria Fomina, Jan Gutermuth, Jiyoung Ahn, Fernando Valenzuela, Mahreen Ameen, Martin Steinhoff, Mark G Kirchhof, Peter Lio, Andreas Wollenberg

Onderzoeksoutput: Articlepeer review

3 Citaten (Scopus)

Samenvatting

BACKGROUND: Current treat-to-target recommendations for atopic dermatitis (AD) may not include high enough treatment targets and do not fully consider patient needs.

OBJECTIVE: To develop recommendations for optimized AD management, including disease severity assessments, treatment goals and targets, and guidance for treatment escalation/modification.

METHODS: An international group of expert dermatologists drafted a series of recommendations for AD management using insights from a global patient study and 87 expert dermatologists from 44 countries. Experts voted on recommendations using a modified eDelphi voting process.

RESULTS: The Aiming High in Eczema/Atopic Dermatitis (AHEAD) recommendations establish a novel approach to AD management, incorporating shared decision-making and a concept for minimal disease activity (MDA). Consensus (≥70% agreement) was reached for all recommendations in 1 round of voting; strong consensus (≥90% agreement) was reached for 30/34 recommendations. In the AHEAD approach, patients select their most troublesome AD feature(s); the clinician chooses a corresponding patient-reported severity measure and objective severity measure. Treatment targets are chosen from a list of 'moderate' and 'optimal' targets, with achievement of 'optimal' targets defined as MDA.

CONCLUSIONS: Patient and expert insights led to the development of AHEAD recommendations, which establish a novel approach to AD management. Patients were not involved in the eDelphi voting process used to generate consensus on each recommendation. However, patient perspectives were captured in a global, qualitative patient research study that was considered by the experts in their initial drafting of the recommendations.

Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)2139-2148
Aantal pagina's10
TijdschriftJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Volume38
Nummer van het tijdschrift11
DOI's
StatusPublished - nov 2024

Bibliografische nota

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

Citeer dit