There is an error in the Conflict of Interest statement. The correct statement is “ML has received lecture and consultancy fees from Alexion, Amgen, Kyowa Kirin, Menarini, Sandoz, Takeda, UCB and Will-Pharma. JS has received lecture, consultancy fees, and conference support from Kyowa Kirin, Alexion, Eli-Lily, Ferring, Ipsen, Menarini, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sandoz, and Siemens Healthcare. DT has received conference support from Novo Nordisk. NG, JLa, and KH have received consultancy fees from Kyowa Kirin. EB has received conference support from Novo Nordisk and Pfizer. CH has received conference support from Novo Nordisk and Ferring. EC has received consultancy fees from bioMérieux, Diasorin, Fujirebio, IDS, and Menarini. PH is an employee of GlaxoSmithKline but participates in his own capacity. J-FK has received consultancy fees and conference support from Heel Belgium, Sanofi, and TRB Chemedica. KW has received conference support from Alexion, Ferring, Kyowa Kirin and Novo Nordisk. CV has received conference support from Boehringer Ingelheim. GM has received consultancy fees from Alexion, Biomarin, Kyowa Kirin, and Pfizer. EL has received consultancy fees and travel support from Kyowa Kirin, Chiesi, and Recordati. JV has received conference support and consultancy fees from Alexion, Bellco, Ferring, Medtronic, and Kyowa Kirin. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. There should be a change to Treatment section. A 0.4 mg/kg bodyweight dose is mentioned, whereas the most recently approved dose is a 0.8 mg/kg bodyweight dose. In the subsection “Burosumab” in the fifth paragraph, the first sentence should read as follows: The EMA-approved dose in children is a 2-weekly s.c. injection starting 0.8 mg/kg bodyweight, increased with 0.4 mg/kg dose increments (max. 2.0 mg/kg, cap at 90 mg dose) to achieve fasting plasma phosphate concentrations in the lownormal range for age. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.