12 Citaten (Scopus)

Samenvatting

Intrinsically disordered proteins, defying the traditional protein structure–function paradigm, are a challenge to study experimentally. Because a large part of our knowledge rests on computational predictions, it is crucial that their accuracy is high. The Critical Assessment of protein Intrinsic Disorder prediction (CAID) experiment was established as a community-based blind test to determine the state of the art in prediction of intrinsically disordered regions and the subset of residues involved in binding. A total of 43 methods were evaluated on a dataset of 646 proteins from DisProt. The best methods use deep learning techniques and notably outperform physicochemical methods. The top disorder predictor has Fmax = 0.483 on the full dataset and Fmax = 0.792 following filtering out of bona fide structured regions. Disordered binding regions remain hard to predict, with Fmax = 0.231. Interestingly, computing times among methods can vary by up to four orders of magnitude.

Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)472-481
Aantal pagina's10
TijdschriftNature Methods
Volume18
Nummer van het tijdschrift5
DOI's
StatusPublished - mei 2021

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Critical assessment of protein intrinsic disorder prediction'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit