Diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography for stenosis detection according to calcium score: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Martijn Am Den Dekker, Kristof De Smet, Geertruida H De Bock, Rene Tio, M. Oudkerk, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart

Onderzoeksoutput: Articlepeer review

54 Citaten (Scopus)

Samenvatting

Objectives
A systematic review and meta-analysis to assess sensitivity and specificity of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) for significant stenosis at different degrees of coronary calcification.
Methods
A literature search was performed including studies describing test characteristics of CCTA for significant stenosis, performed with at least 16-MDCT and according to calcium score (CS). Invasive coronary angiography was the reference standard. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of CCTA by CS categories and CT equipment were calculated.
Results
Of 14,121 articles, 51 studies reported on the impact of calcium scoring on diagnostic performance of CCTA and could be included in the systematic review. Twenty-seven of these studies (5,203 participants) were suitable for meta-analysis. On a patient-basis, sensitivity of CCTA for significant stenosis was 95.8, 95.6, 97.6 and 99.0% for CS 0-100, 101-400, 401-1,000 and >1,000 respectively. Specificity was 91.2, 88.2, 50.6 and 84.0% respectively. Specificity of CCTA was significantly lower for CS 401-1,000 due to lack of patients without significant stenosis. Sensitivity and specificity of 16-MDCT were significantly lower compared to more modern CT systems.
Conclusions
Even in cases of severe coronary calcification, sensitivity and specificity of CCTA for significant stenosis are high. With 64-MDCT and newer CT systems, a CS cut-off for performing CCTA no longer seems indicated.
Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)1688-1698
Aantal pagina's11
TijdschriftEuropean Radiology
Volume22
Nummer van het tijdschrift12
StatusPublished - dec. 2012

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography for stenosis detection according to calcium score: Systematic review and meta-analysis'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit