TY - JOUR
T1 - Exposure and physical vulnerability to geo-hydrological hazards in rural environments
T2 - A field-based assessment in East Africa
AU - Sekajugo, John
AU - Kagoro-Rugunda, Grace
AU - Mutyebere, Rodgers
AU - Kabaseke, Clovis
AU - Mubiru, David
AU - Kanyiginya, Violet
AU - Vranken, Liesbet
AU - Jacobs, Liesbet
AU - Dewitte, Olivier
AU - Kervyn, Matthieu
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was mainly supported by the Flemish Inter University Council (VLIR- UOS ) through the TEAM project ( UG2019TEA492A10 5) titled ‘Digital citizen science for community-based resilient environmental management (D-SiRe)’ implemented in a collaboration between Vrije Universiteit Brussels, KU Leuven , Royal Museum for Central Africa, Mbarara University of Science and Technology and Mountains of the Moon University. Extra financial support was also received from the Directorate-General Development Cooperation and Humanitarian Aid of Belgium through the project funded by Development Cooperation programme of the Royal Museum for Central Africa tilted “Natural Hazards, RISks and Society in Africa: developing knowledge and capacities (HARISSA) implemented in collaboration between Mbarara University of Science and Technology and Vrije Universiteit Brussels. We also thank the district construction and road engineers and mansion builders in the communities where data were collected for accepting to participate in valuing the exposed buildings and road infrastructure.
Funding Information:
Population increase is a worldwide issue, particularly in the Global South where demographic growth is often above average [1]. This growth is commonly associated with uncontrolled and informal settlements; leading already more vulnerable people to settle in areas more prone to geo-hydrological hazards such as floods and landslides [ 2–5]. Landslides and floods are often associated with large impact on physical infrastructure like buildings, roads and bridges rendering many people homeless or limiting access to critical health care, education, and business centres [ 6–8]. The impact is expected to increase especially in countries of the Global South due to population increase and the associated land use and land cover change [9,10]. To reduce the risk associated with these hazard processes, there is need to understand not only the hazard components, but also the nature of the elements exposed to the hazards, the impacts induced and what controls the level of impact (vulnerability) [ 11–13]. This is clearly stressed by the Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction (DRR) which specifies that countries should not stop at hazard identification but rather seek to understand disaster risk in all its dimensions including detailed exposure and vulnerability assessments for comprehensive risk analysis and development of reduction strategies [14]. Although the United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR) has supported many countries to develop national databases of different hazards as a step to risk assessment and management, in most countries, and especially in Africa, it is still a challenge. Previous studies on landslides [ 15–21] and floods [21,22] have commonly concentrated on hazard assessment and still lack information on exposure and vulnerabilities to explicitly understand the risk and come up with viable reduction strategies [23]. The limited understanding of exposure and vulnerability should be dealt with if more is to be done on reducing risk other than just treating symptoms [24].This study was mainly supported by the Flemish Inter University Council (VLIR-UOS) through the TEAM project (UG2019TEA492A105) titled ‘Digital citizen science for community-based resilient environmental management (D-SiRe)’ implemented in a collaboration between Vrije Universiteit Brussels, KU Leuven, Royal Museum for Central Africa, Mbarara University of Science and Technology and Mountains of the Moon University. Extra financial support was also received from the Directorate-General Development Cooperation and Humanitarian Aid of Belgium through the project funded by Development Cooperation programme of the Royal Museum for Central Africa tilted “Natural Hazards, RISks and Society in Africa: developing knowledge and capacities (HARISSA) implemented in collaboration between Mbarara University of Science and Technology and Vrije Universiteit Brussels. We also thank the district construction and road engineers and mansion builders in the communities where data were collected for accepting to participate in valuing the exposed buildings and road infrastructure.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2024/2/15
Y1 - 2024/2/15
N2 - Geo-hydrological hazards (landslides and floods) are often associated with large impact on physical infrastructures, affecting strongly the exposed population. Understanding in detail the nature of exposure and what determines the extent of impact is a prerequisite for building resilient structures and reducing vulnerability. However, such information is rarely available, especially in rural communities where people are often the most vulnerable. In this study we document the impact of landslide and flood hazards in 17 sub-counties in the mid- and south-western parts of Uganda between May 2019 and March 2021 through extensive fieldwork involving local stakeholders. We quantify the economic value of the physical damage of landslide and flood hazards on exposed buildings, roads and bridges. We then determine statistically the factors that influence the physical vulnerability of the elements at risk based on damage ratios, i.e. monetary value of each individual building damage divided by its initial construction value. A total of 91 and 212 buildings were documented from the landslide and flood hazard affected zones, respectively. Out of the 91 landslide affected buildings, 71 % were completely destroyed and 4 % severely damaged, while 19 % had minor-to-no damage at all. For floods, 37 % of the buildings were completely destroyed and 6 % were severely damaged, while 53 % had minor-to-no damage. The impact of landslides and floods is unevenly distributed across the study sub-counties and the extent of loss they cause also vary with exposed elements. Based on parameters that could be documented through our field-based approach, we conclude that while the physical vulnerability of buildings to landslides is equally associated with both landslide size and building structural characteristics, the physical vulnerability due to floods is largely linked to the flood depth. This quantitative study therefore shows the need for plans, policies and strategies geared towards improving the building resistance to landslides and controlling settlements in flood prone places.
AB - Geo-hydrological hazards (landslides and floods) are often associated with large impact on physical infrastructures, affecting strongly the exposed population. Understanding in detail the nature of exposure and what determines the extent of impact is a prerequisite for building resilient structures and reducing vulnerability. However, such information is rarely available, especially in rural communities where people are often the most vulnerable. In this study we document the impact of landslide and flood hazards in 17 sub-counties in the mid- and south-western parts of Uganda between May 2019 and March 2021 through extensive fieldwork involving local stakeholders. We quantify the economic value of the physical damage of landslide and flood hazards on exposed buildings, roads and bridges. We then determine statistically the factors that influence the physical vulnerability of the elements at risk based on damage ratios, i.e. monetary value of each individual building damage divided by its initial construction value. A total of 91 and 212 buildings were documented from the landslide and flood hazard affected zones, respectively. Out of the 91 landslide affected buildings, 71 % were completely destroyed and 4 % severely damaged, while 19 % had minor-to-no damage at all. For floods, 37 % of the buildings were completely destroyed and 6 % were severely damaged, while 53 % had minor-to-no damage. The impact of landslides and floods is unevenly distributed across the study sub-counties and the extent of loss they cause also vary with exposed elements. Based on parameters that could be documented through our field-based approach, we conclude that while the physical vulnerability of buildings to landslides is equally associated with both landslide size and building structural characteristics, the physical vulnerability due to floods is largely linked to the flood depth. This quantitative study therefore shows the need for plans, policies and strategies geared towards improving the building resistance to landslides and controlling settlements in flood prone places.
KW - Field-based damage estimation
KW - Floods
KW - Landslides
KW - Natural hazard risk
KW - Uganda
KW - Vulnerability curve
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85183298079&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104282
DO - 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104282
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85183298079
VL - 102
JO - International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
JF - International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
SN - 2212-4209
M1 - 104282
ER -