Doorgaan naar hoofdnavigatie Doorgaan naar zoeken Ga verder naar hoofdinhoud

How Low Back Pain is Managed-A Mixed-Methods Study in 32 Countries. Part 2 of Low Back Pain in Low- and Middle-Income Countries Series

  • Saurab Sharma
  • , Anupa Pathak
  • , Romy Parker
  • , Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa
  • , Babita Ghai
  • , Chinonso Igwesi-Chidobe
  • , Prawit Janwantanakul
  • , Fabianna Resende de Jesus-Moraleida
  • , Mulugeta Bayisa Chala
  • , Mohammadreza Pourahmadi
  • , Andrew M Briggs
  • , Edward Gorgon
  • , Clare L Ardern
  • , Karim M Khan
  • , James H McAuley
  • , Alia Alghwiri
  • , Oluwayomi Abolade Aoko
  • , Habibu Salisu Badamasi
  • , Jose A Calvache
  • , Mary Suma Cardosa
  • Shankar Ganesh, Moges Gashaw, Johanna Ghiringhelli, Santiago Gigena, ATM Tanveer Hasan, Syed Atiqul Haq, Emmanuel Ng’wiza Jacob, Dina Christa Janse van Rensburg, Oyéné Kossi, Chang Liu, Rinkle Malani, Brett James Nairn Mason, Charbel Najem, Tania Ines Nava-Bringas, Ildephonse Nduwimana, Romain Perera, Wajida Perveen, Andrés Pierobon, Emília Pinto, Rafael Z Pinto, Firmansyah Purwanto, Mohammad Dawood Rahimi, Felipe JJ Reis, Md Abu Bakar Siddiq, Dipak Shrestha, Monu Tamang, Lenny Vasanthan T, Carel Viljoen

Onderzoeksoutput: Articlepeer review

17 Citaten (Scopus)
31 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

BACKGROUND: The Lancet Low Back Pain (LBP) Series highlighted the lack of LBP data from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The study aimed to describe (1) what LBP care is currently delivered in LMICs and (2) how that care is delivered. DESIGN: An online mixed-methods study. METHODS: A Consortium for LBP in LMICs (n = 65) was developed with an expert panel of leading LBP researchers (>2 publications on LBP) and multidisciplinary clinicians and patient partners with 5 years of clinical/lived LBP experience in LMICs. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Two researchers independently analyzed qualitative data using inductive and deductive coding and developed a thematic framework. RESULTS: Forty-seven (85%) of 55 invited panel members representing 32 LMICs completed the survey (38% women, 62% men). The panel included clinicians (34%), researchers (28%), educators (6%), and people with lived experience (4%). Pharmacotherapies and electrophysiological agents were the most used LBP treatments. The thematic framework comprised 8 themes: (1) self-management is ubiquitous, (2) medicines are the cornerstone, (3) traditional therapies have a place, (4) society plays an important role, (5) imaging use is very common, (6) reliance on passive approaches, (7) social determinants influence LBP care pathway, and (8) health systems are ill-prepared to address LBP burden. CONCLUSION: LBP care in LMICs did not consistently align with the best available evidence. Findings will help research prioritization in LMICs and guide global LBP clinical guidelines. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(8):560-572. Epub 11 April 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12406.

Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)560-572
Aantal pagina's13
TijdschriftInternational journal of sports physical therapy
Volume54
Nummer van het tijdschrift8
DOI's
StatusPublished - aug. 2024

Bibliografische nota

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright ©2024 The Authors.

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'How Low Back Pain is Managed-A Mixed-Methods Study in 32 Countries. Part 2 of Low Back Pain in Low- and Middle-Income Countries Series'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit