Hybrid Vehicle Rating Criteria

Peter Van Den Bossche; Gaston Maggetto; Yvan Baudoin; Wolfgang Brand; Bruno Carrier-Marquis; Guy Crittenden; Sten Groh; Gus Khalil; Pascale Lehmann; Richard Rawlins; Emil Spahn

Hybrid Vehicle Rating Criteria

Peter Van Den Bossche, Gaston Maggetto, Yvan Baudoin, Wolfgang Brand, Bruno Carrier-Marquis, Guy Crittenden, Sten Groh, Gus Khalil, Pascale Lehmann, Richard Rawlins, Emil Spahn

Elektrotechniek-Energietechniek

Onderzoeksoutput: Commissioned report

Samenvatting

Compte tenu de l'intérêt croissant pour les Véhicules Electriques Hybrides (HEV) et la dotation prévue de
ces véhicules dans les parcs de l'OTAN dans les cinq à dix prochaines années, l'AVT-106 a été constitué
pour établir les critères d'évaluation des HEV militaires, pour comparer les différents concepts et déterminer
les systèmes les plus appropriés pour les différents scénarios de mission. Eu égard à la complexité de cette
tâche, le groupe a décidé de diviser le travail en deux parties : la première partie consistera à identifier les
paramètres ayant un impact sur la dotation des HEV militaires et les nouvelles exigences qui doivent être
satisfaites avant de mettre en service de tels véhicules. La seconde partie, proposée ultérieurement, consistera
à établir de nouveaux critères d'évaluation.
L'étude a examiné quels seraient les critères d'évaluation à appliquer aux HEV, et ensuite, a identifié,
quand ils existaient, les normes et les critères à appliquer et les domaines où des nouvelles normes
devraient être nécessaires. Les principales conclusions de l'étude sont les suivantes :
* Les critères d'évaluation devraient mettre l'accent sur les possibilités élargies de la technologie
hybride comprenant un générateur auxiliaire de bord, une synergie de génération à impulsions,
une surveillance silencieuse étendue et une mobilité silencieuse.
* Les normes actuelles couvrent une large part des HEV mais des normes supplémentaires doivent
être développées pour aborder les aspects particuliers de la technologie électrique hybride.
* L'introduction des HEV dans les parcs militaires nécessitera une évaluation des échanges entre les
besoins des utilisateurs et les possibilités des nouvelles technologies ainsi que les coûts et les
risques associés.
* La génération d'impulsions crée de très importants champs magnétiques, électriques et de tension
qui nécessitent donc la prise en compte des normes correspondantes CEM.
* La sécurité du personnel requiert des normes supplémentaires dues à la haute tension des
composants.
* Les normes internationales doivent être élargies pour prendre en compte les aspects liés aux
missions spécifiques en mettant l'accent sur la CEM.
* La génération d'impulsions disponible dans les HEV permet l'usage des armes électriques
(canons, DEW, etc.) et la protection électrique.
L'étude recommande :
* Qu'il y ait une activité de suivi pour définir les critères d'évaluation des HEV et débuter le
processus de génération de nouvelles normes sur la technologie électrique hybride et la transition
vers des STANAGs.
* Que les données des essais sur le terrain des HEV militaires soient utilisées pour fixer les
performances de base des véhicules hybrides.
* Que les échanges de données soient utilisés pour le développement des besoins des utilisateurs
face aux risques technologiques (technique, calendrier, coûts, etc.).

Originele taal-2	English
Uitgeverij	NATO Research and Technology Organisation
Uitgave	RTO-TR-AVT-106
Status	Published - mei 2009

NATO RTO Scientific Achievement Award 2005
Van Den Bossche, Peter (Recipient), 2005
Prijs: Prize (including medals and awards)

Citeer dit

@book{2cdd23be2ed44c7884ac30e06143cec4,

title = "Hybrid Vehicle Rating Criteria",

abstract = "In view of the increased interest in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (HEV) and the expected fielding of these vehicles in the NATO fleets in the next five to ten years, AVT-106 was formed to establish rating criteria for military HEVs to compare the different concepts and determine the most appropriate systems for the different mission scenarios. Due to the complexity of this task, the group decided to divide the work into two parts, the first part is to identify the parameters that impact the fielding of military HEVs and the new requirements that must be met before implementation of such vehicles can take place. The second part, which is proposed as future work, is to establish new rating criteria. The study examined what rating criteria would need to be applied to HEVs, and then identified if existing standards and criteria were applicable and areas where new standards would be required. The main conclusions that resulted from the study are: * Evaluation criteria should emphasise the expanded capabilities of hybrid technology including onboard auxiliary power, pulsed power synergy, extended silent watch and silent mobility. * Current standards cover a large part of HEVs but more standards must be developed to address the unique aspects of hybrid electric technology. * The introduction of HEVs into the military fleet will necessitate an assessment of trades between the user requirements against the new technology capabilities and associated cost and risks. * Pulsed power generates very high voltages and electric and magnetic fields thus necessitating the inclusion of EMC related standards. * Personnel safety will require additional standards due to high voltage components. * International standards must be expanded to address specific mission related aspects with emphasis on EMC. * The availability of pulsed power in HEVs enable the application of electric weapons (guns, DEW, etc.) and electric protection. The study recommends that: * There should be a follow-on effort to define HEV rating criteria and start the process of generating new standards for hybrid electric technology and the transition to STANAGs. * Test data from field trials of military HEVs should be used to set the baseline performance of hybrid vehicles. * Trade studies should be used for development of user requirements versus technology risks (technical, schedule, costs, etc.). * NATO HEVs should stay within the maximum supply voltage levels dictated by ECE 73/13 due to costs and complexity implications. * The standards and rating criteria for kinetic energy electric weapons have to be addressed for future use. For directed energy weapons some standards already exist but have to be adapted for high voltage and high power systems",

keywords = "hybrid vehicles, electric vehicles, military vehicles",

author = "{Van Den Bossche}, Peter and Gaston Maggetto and Yvan Baudoin and Wolfgang Brand and Bruno Carrier-Marquis and Guy Crittenden and Sten Groh and Gus Khalil and Pascale Lehmann and Richard Rawlins and Emil Spahn",

year = "2009",

month = may,

language = "English",

publisher = "NATO Research and Technology Organisation",

edition = "RTO-TR-AVT-106",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - Hybrid Vehicle Rating Criteria

AU - Van Den Bossche, Peter

AU - Maggetto, Gaston

AU - Baudoin, Yvan

AU - Brand, Wolfgang

AU - Carrier-Marquis, Bruno

AU - Crittenden, Guy

AU - Groh, Sten

AU - Khalil, Gus

AU - Lehmann, Pascale

AU - Rawlins, Richard

AU - Spahn, Emil

PY - 2009/5

Y1 - 2009/5

N2 - In view of the increased interest in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (HEV) and the expected fielding of these vehicles in the NATO fleets in the next five to ten years, AVT-106 was formed to establish rating criteria for military HEVs to compare the different concepts and determine the most appropriate systems for the different mission scenarios. Due to the complexity of this task, the group decided to divide the work into two parts, the first part is to identify the parameters that impact the fielding of military HEVs and the new requirements that must be met before implementation of such vehicles can take place. The second part, which is proposed as future work, is to establish new rating criteria. The study examined what rating criteria would need to be applied to HEVs, and then identified if existing standards and criteria were applicable and areas where new standards would be required. The main conclusions that resulted from the study are: * Evaluation criteria should emphasise the expanded capabilities of hybrid technology including onboard auxiliary power, pulsed power synergy, extended silent watch and silent mobility. * Current standards cover a large part of HEVs but more standards must be developed to address the unique aspects of hybrid electric technology. * The introduction of HEVs into the military fleet will necessitate an assessment of trades between the user requirements against the new technology capabilities and associated cost and risks. * Pulsed power generates very high voltages and electric and magnetic fields thus necessitating the inclusion of EMC related standards. * Personnel safety will require additional standards due to high voltage components. * International standards must be expanded to address specific mission related aspects with emphasis on EMC. * The availability of pulsed power in HEVs enable the application of electric weapons (guns, DEW, etc.) and electric protection. The study recommends that: * There should be a follow-on effort to define HEV rating criteria and start the process of generating new standards for hybrid electric technology and the transition to STANAGs. * Test data from field trials of military HEVs should be used to set the baseline performance of hybrid vehicles. * Trade studies should be used for development of user requirements versus technology risks (technical, schedule, costs, etc.). * NATO HEVs should stay within the maximum supply voltage levels dictated by ECE 73/13 due to costs and complexity implications. * The standards and rating criteria for kinetic energy electric weapons have to be addressed for future use. For directed energy weapons some standards already exist but have to be adapted for high voltage and high power systems

AB - In view of the increased interest in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (HEV) and the expected fielding of these vehicles in the NATO fleets in the next five to ten years, AVT-106 was formed to establish rating criteria for military HEVs to compare the different concepts and determine the most appropriate systems for the different mission scenarios. Due to the complexity of this task, the group decided to divide the work into two parts, the first part is to identify the parameters that impact the fielding of military HEVs and the new requirements that must be met before implementation of such vehicles can take place. The second part, which is proposed as future work, is to establish new rating criteria. The study examined what rating criteria would need to be applied to HEVs, and then identified if existing standards and criteria were applicable and areas where new standards would be required. The main conclusions that resulted from the study are: * Evaluation criteria should emphasise the expanded capabilities of hybrid technology including onboard auxiliary power, pulsed power synergy, extended silent watch and silent mobility. * Current standards cover a large part of HEVs but more standards must be developed to address the unique aspects of hybrid electric technology. * The introduction of HEVs into the military fleet will necessitate an assessment of trades between the user requirements against the new technology capabilities and associated cost and risks. * Pulsed power generates very high voltages and electric and magnetic fields thus necessitating the inclusion of EMC related standards. * Personnel safety will require additional standards due to high voltage components. * International standards must be expanded to address specific mission related aspects with emphasis on EMC. * The availability of pulsed power in HEVs enable the application of electric weapons (guns, DEW, etc.) and electric protection. The study recommends that: * There should be a follow-on effort to define HEV rating criteria and start the process of generating new standards for hybrid electric technology and the transition to STANAGs. * Test data from field trials of military HEVs should be used to set the baseline performance of hybrid vehicles. * Trade studies should be used for development of user requirements versus technology risks (technical, schedule, costs, etc.). * NATO HEVs should stay within the maximum supply voltage levels dictated by ECE 73/13 due to costs and complexity implications. * The standards and rating criteria for kinetic energy electric weapons have to be addressed for future use. For directed energy weapons some standards already exist but have to be adapted for high voltage and high power systems

KW - hybrid vehicles

KW - electric vehicles

KW - military vehicles

M3 - Commissioned report

BT - Hybrid Vehicle Rating Criteria

PB - NATO Research and Technology Organisation

ER -

Hybrid Vehicle Rating Criteria

Samenvatting

Vingerafdruk

Prijzen

NATO RTO Scientific Achievement Award 2005

Citeer dit