TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of different endometrial preparation protocols before frozen embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes
T2 - a review
AU - Roelens, Caroline
AU - Blockeel, Christophe
N1 - Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - The use of frozen embryo transfer cycles has exponentially increased in the last few years. Optimization of endometrial preparation protocols before frozen embryo transfer is mandatory to further improve pregnancy outcomes. This review will focus on the existing literature with regard to the different available endometrial preparation protocols and their impact on pregnancy outcomes. More specifically, we will focus on programmed, natural, and stimulated frozen embryo transfer cycles. The studies performed on this topic are generally of low quality, and only a few well-performed randomized controlled trials have been published. To date, no strong evidence is available to support the use of 1 preparation method over another in terms of pregnancy outcomes. However, robust data have shown a clearly protective effect of natural frozen embryo transfer cycles against long-term obstetric complications, mainly hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and large for gestational age infants. The introduction of individualized luteal phase support in different endometrial preparation protocols is actually gaining a lot of attention and requires further investigation.
AB - The use of frozen embryo transfer cycles has exponentially increased in the last few years. Optimization of endometrial preparation protocols before frozen embryo transfer is mandatory to further improve pregnancy outcomes. This review will focus on the existing literature with regard to the different available endometrial preparation protocols and their impact on pregnancy outcomes. More specifically, we will focus on programmed, natural, and stimulated frozen embryo transfer cycles. The studies performed on this topic are generally of low quality, and only a few well-performed randomized controlled trials have been published. To date, no strong evidence is available to support the use of 1 preparation method over another in terms of pregnancy outcomes. However, robust data have shown a clearly protective effect of natural frozen embryo transfer cycles against long-term obstetric complications, mainly hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and large for gestational age infants. The introduction of individualized luteal phase support in different endometrial preparation protocols is actually gaining a lot of attention and requires further investigation.
KW - Pregnancy
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Pregnancy Rate
KW - Cryopreservation/methods
KW - Embryo Transfer/methods
KW - Endometrium
KW - Luteal Phase
KW - Retrospective Studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140291443&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.09.003
DO - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.09.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 36273850
SN - 0015-0282
VL - 118
SP - 820
EP - 827
JO - Fertility and Sterility
JF - Fertility and Sterility
IS - 5
ER -