Samenvatting
Originele taal-2 | English |
---|---|
Pagina's (van-tot) | 2387–2417 |
Aantal pagina's | 31 |
Tijdschrift | Geoscientific Model Development |
Volume | 17 |
Nummer van het tijdschrift | 6 |
DOI's | |
Status | Published - 22 mrt. 2024 |
Bibliografische nota
Publisher Copyright:© Copyright:
Toegang tot document
Andere bestanden en links
Citeer dit
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
In: Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 17, Nr. 6, 22.03.2024, blz. 2387–2417.
Onderzoeksoutput: Article › peer review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Interactions between atmospheric composition and climate change – progress in understanding and future opportunities from AerChemMIP, PDRMIP, and RFMIP
AU - Fiedler, Stephanie
AU - Naik, Vaishali
AU - O'Connor, Fiona M.
AU - Smith, Christopher J.
AU - Griffiths, Paul
AU - Kramer, Ryan J.
AU - Takemura, Toshihiko
AU - Allen, Robert J.
AU - Im, Ulas
AU - Kasoar, Matthew
AU - Modak, Angshuman
AU - Turnock, Steven
AU - Voulgarakis, Apostolos
AU - Watson-Parris, Duncan
AU - Westervelt, Daniel M.
AU - Wilcox, Laura J.
AU - Zhao, Alcide
AU - Collins, William J.
AU - Schulz, Michael
AU - Myhre, Gunnar
AU - Forster, Piers M.
N1 - Funding Information: Stephanie Fiedler has been supported by the German Science Foundation (DFG), with projects in the Collaborative Research Centers SFB1502 (grant no. DFG 450058266) and SFB1211 (grant no. DFG 268236062), and DOMOS, funded by the European Space Agency. Fiona M. O'Connor has been supported by the Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme funded by BEIS (GA01101) and the EU Horizon 2020 Research Programme CRESCENDO (grant no. 641816) and ESM2025 (grant no. 101003536) projects. Christopher J. Smith has been supported by a NERC/IIASA Collaborative Research Fellowship (grant no. NE/T009381/1). Toshihiko Takemura has been supported by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (grant no. JPMEERF21S12010) of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency, Japan, and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI (grant no. JP19H05669). Matthew Kasoar and Apostolos Voulgarakis have been supported by the Leverhulme Centre for Wildfires, Environment, and Society through the Leverhulme Trust (grant no. RC-2018-023). Apostolos Voulgarakis has been funded by the by the AXA Research Fund (project “AXA Chair in Wildfires and Climate”) and by the Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation (grant no. 3453). Angshuman Modak has been supported through funding from the European Research Council (grant no. 770765). Ryan J. Kramer has been supported by a NOAA Award (NA18OAR4310269) and NASA (grant no. 8NSSC21K1968). Gunnar Myhre has been supported by the Horizon 2020 project CONSTRAIN (grant no. 820829). Duncan Watson-Parris acknowledges funding from NERC (project NE/S005390/1) (ACRUISE). Steven Turnock would like to acknowledge that support for this work came from the UK–China Research and Innovation Partnership Fund through the Met Office Climate Science for Service Partnership (CSSP) China, as part of the Newton Fund. Laura J. Wilcox has been supported by the National Centre for Atmospheric Science, the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC; grant no. NE/W004895/1, TerraFIRMA), and the Research Council of Norway (grant no. 324182, CATHY).The article processing charges for this open-access publication were covered by the GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel. Funding Information: Stephanie Fiedler has been supported by the German Science Foundation (DFG), with projects in the Collaborative Research Centers SFB1502 (grant no. DFG 450058266) and SFB1211 (grant no. DFG 268236062), and DOMOS, funded by the European Space Agency. Fiona M. O'Connor has been supported by the Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme funded by BEIS (GA01101) and the EU Horizon 2020 Research Programme CRESCENDO (grant no. 641816) and ESM2025 (grant no. 101003536) projects. Christopher J. Smith has been supported by a NERC/IIASA Collaborative Research Fellowship (grant no. NE/T009381/1). Toshihiko Takemura has been supported by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (grant no. JPMEERF21S12010) of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency, Japan, and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI (grant no. JP19H05669). Matthew Kasoar and Apostolos Voulgarakis have been supported by the Leverhulme Centre for Wildfires, Environment, and Society through the Leverhulme Trust (grant no. RC-2018-023). Apostolos Voulgarakis has been funded by the by the AXA Research Fund (project AXA Chair in Wildfires and Climate) and by the Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation (grant no. 3453). Angshuman Modak has been supported through funding from the European Research Council (grant no. 770765). Ryan J. Kramer has been supported by a NOAA Award (NA18OAR4310269) and NASA (grant no. 8NSSC21K1968). Gunnar Myhre has been supported by the Horizon 2020 project CONSTRAIN (grant no. 820829). Duncan Watson-Parris acknowledges funding from NERC (project NE/S005390/1) (ACRUISE). Steven Turnock would like to acknowledge that support for this work came from the UK"China Research and Innovation Partnership Fund through the Met Office Climate Science for Service Partnership (CSSP) China, as part of the Newton Fund. Laura J. Wilcox has been supported by the National Centre for Atmospheric Science, the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC; grant no. NE/W004895/1, TerraFIRMA), and the Research Council of Norway (grant no. 324182, CATHY). The article processing charges for this open-access publication were covered by the GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel. Publisher Copyright: © Copyright:
PY - 2024/3/22
Y1 - 2024/3/22
N2 - The climate science community aims to improve our understanding of climate change due to anthropogenic influences on atmospheric composition and the Earth's surface. Yet not all climate interactions are fully understood, and uncertainty in climate model results persists, as assessed in the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessment report. We synthesize current challenges and emphasize opportunities for advancing our understanding of the interactions between atmospheric composition, air quality, and climate change, as well as for quantifying model diversity. Our perspective is based on expert views from three multi-model intercomparison projects (MIPs) – the Precipitation Driver Response MIP (PDRMIP), the Aerosol Chemistry MIP (AerChemMIP), and the Radiative Forcing MIP (RFMIP). While there are many shared interests and specializations across the MIPs, they have their own scientific foci and specific approaches. The partial overlap between the MIPs proved useful for advancing the understanding of the perturbation–response paradigm through multi-model ensembles of Earth system models of varying complexity. We discuss the challenges of gaining insights from Earth system models that face computational and process representation limits and provide guidance from our lessons learned. Promising ideas to overcome some long-standing challenges in the near future are kilometer-scale experiments to better simulate circulation-dependent processes where it is possible and machine learning approaches where they are needed, e.g., for faster and better subgrid-scale parameterizations and pattern recognition in big data. New model constraints can arise from augmented observational products that leverage multiple datasets with machine learning approaches. Future MIPs can develop smart experiment protocols that strive towards an optimal trade-off between the resolution, complexity, and number of simulations and their length and, thereby, help to advance the understanding of climate change and its impacts.
AB - The climate science community aims to improve our understanding of climate change due to anthropogenic influences on atmospheric composition and the Earth's surface. Yet not all climate interactions are fully understood, and uncertainty in climate model results persists, as assessed in the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessment report. We synthesize current challenges and emphasize opportunities for advancing our understanding of the interactions between atmospheric composition, air quality, and climate change, as well as for quantifying model diversity. Our perspective is based on expert views from three multi-model intercomparison projects (MIPs) – the Precipitation Driver Response MIP (PDRMIP), the Aerosol Chemistry MIP (AerChemMIP), and the Radiative Forcing MIP (RFMIP). While there are many shared interests and specializations across the MIPs, they have their own scientific foci and specific approaches. The partial overlap between the MIPs proved useful for advancing the understanding of the perturbation–response paradigm through multi-model ensembles of Earth system models of varying complexity. We discuss the challenges of gaining insights from Earth system models that face computational and process representation limits and provide guidance from our lessons learned. Promising ideas to overcome some long-standing challenges in the near future are kilometer-scale experiments to better simulate circulation-dependent processes where it is possible and machine learning approaches where they are needed, e.g., for faster and better subgrid-scale parameterizations and pattern recognition in big data. New model constraints can arise from augmented observational products that leverage multiple datasets with machine learning approaches. Future MIPs can develop smart experiment protocols that strive towards an optimal trade-off between the resolution, complexity, and number of simulations and their length and, thereby, help to advance the understanding of climate change and its impacts.
UR - https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2387-2024
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85188575975&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5194/gmd-17-2387-2024
DO - 10.5194/gmd-17-2387-2024
M3 - Article
SN - 1991-959X
VL - 17
SP - 2387
EP - 2417
JO - Geoscientific Model Development
JF - Geoscientific Model Development
IS - 6
ER -