TY - JOUR
T1 - Mathematicians Writing for Mathematicians
AU - Andersen, Line Edslev
AU - Johansend, Mikkel Willum
AU - Sørensen, Henrik Kragh
N1 - Funding Information:
We are deeply indebted to Adam and Thomas for letting us into their space of collaboration and supervision. We have presented our research in local groups and at the Oxford conference, and we are very grateful for the feedback and discussion, we have received, in particular from Alan Bundy and from colleagues. We are also very grateful for the challenging and constructive feedback we received from two anonymous referees. Part of the research for this paper was conducted while the first author was a postdoctoral researcher at the Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. At Aarhus University, she is supported by K. Brad Wray?s Grant, AUFF-E-2017-FLS-7-3.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Springer Nature B.V.
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - We present a case study of how mathematicians write for mathematicians. We have conducted interviews with two research mathematicians, the talented PhD student Adam and his experienced supervisor Thomas, about a research paper they wrote together. Over the course of 2 years, Adam and Thomas revised Adam’s very detailed first draft. At the beginning of this collaboration, Adam was very knowledgeable about the subject of the paper and had good presentational skills but, as a new PhD student, did not yet have experience writing research papers for mathematicians. Thus, one main purpose of revising the paper was to make it take into account the intended audience. For this reason, the changes made to the initial draft and the authors’ purpose in making them provide a window for viewing how mathematicians write for mathematicians. We examined how their paper attracts the interest of the reader and prepares their proofs for validation by the reader. Among other findings, we found that their paper prepares the proofs for two types of validation that the reader can easily switch between.
AB - We present a case study of how mathematicians write for mathematicians. We have conducted interviews with two research mathematicians, the talented PhD student Adam and his experienced supervisor Thomas, about a research paper they wrote together. Over the course of 2 years, Adam and Thomas revised Adam’s very detailed first draft. At the beginning of this collaboration, Adam was very knowledgeable about the subject of the paper and had good presentational skills but, as a new PhD student, did not yet have experience writing research papers for mathematicians. Thus, one main purpose of revising the paper was to make it take into account the intended audience. For this reason, the changes made to the initial draft and the authors’ purpose in making them provide a window for viewing how mathematicians write for mathematicians. We examined how their paper attracts the interest of the reader and prepares their proofs for validation by the reader. Among other findings, we found that their paper prepares the proofs for two types of validation that the reader can easily switch between.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065470776&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11229-019-02145-5
DO - 10.1007/s11229-019-02145-5
M3 - Article
VL - 198
SP - 6233
EP - 6250
JO - Synthese
JF - Synthese
SN - 0039-7857
ER -