TY - JOUR
T1 - New insights into the formation and emplacement of impact melt rocks within the Chicxulub impact structure, following the 2016 IODP-ICDP Expedition 364
AU - de Graaff, Sietze J.
AU - Kaskes, Pim
AU - Déhais, Thomas
AU - Goderis, Steven
AU - Debaille, Vinciane
AU - Ross, Catherine H.
AU - Gulick, Sean P.S.
AU - Feignon, Jean-Guillaume
AU - Ferrière, Ludovic
AU - Koeberl, Christian
AU - Smit, Jan
AU - Mattielli, Nadine
AU - Claeys, Philippe
N1 - Funding Information:
This research used samples and data provided by International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Expedition 364, which was jointly funded by the European Consortium for Ocean Research Drilling (ECORD) and the International Continental Scientific Drilling Program (ICDP), with contributions and logistical support from the Yucat?n state government and Universidad Nacional Aut?noma de M?xico (UNAM). We thank Wendy Debouge and Sabrina Cauchies (Universit? Libre de Bruxelles) for their assistance with sample preparation and analytical procedures. Ruben Vandijck (KU Leuven) is thanked for petrographic and geochemical contributions as part of his master?s degree thesis. Fruitful discussions with Annet Visser strengthened the manuscript. Constructive feedback from Rosa Rijsdijk helped with figure presentation. Roger Gibson, Natalia Hauser, and Steven Jaret are thanked for their constructive reviews. Uwe Reimold is thanked for editorial handling. The Analytical, Environmental & Geo-Chemistry (AMGC) team at Vrije Universiteit Brussel is supported by Research Foundation Flanders (FWO; project G0A6517N) and the Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (BELSPO); P. Kaskes is an FWO Ph.D. fellow (project 11E6619N). V. Debaille acknowledges the European Research Council Starting Grant ?ISo-SyC? (Initial Solar System Composition and Early Planetary Differentiation) and Fund for Scientific Research (FRS-FNRS), Belgium, for funding. Debaille, Matielli, Claeys, and Goderis thank the Excellence of Science project ?ET-HoME? for support. The Vienna group (Feignon, Ferri?re, Koeberl) was partly supported by the University of Vienna doctoral school IK-1045 (principal investigator: C. Koeberl). Funding to Gulick and Ross was provided by U.S. National Science Foundation grant OCE-1737351. This is University of Texas Institute for Geophysics contribution 3690 and Center for Planetary Systems Habitability contribution 0016.
Funding Information:
This research used samples and data provided by International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Expedition 364, which was jointly funded by the European Consortium for Ocean Research Drilling (ECORD) and the International Continental Scientific Drilling Program (ICDP), with contributions and logistical support from the Yucat\u00E1n state government and Universidad Nacional Aut\u00F3noma de M\u00E9xico (UNAM). We thank Wendy Debouge and Sabrina Cauchies (Universit\u00E9 Libre de Bruxelles) for their assistance with sample preparation and analytical procedures. Ruben Vandijck (KU Leuven) is thanked for petrographic and geochemical contributions as part of his master\u2019s degree thesis. Fruitful discussions with Annet Visser strengthened the manuscript. Constructive feedback from Rosa Rijsdijk helped with figure presentation. Roger Gibson, Natalia Hauser, and Steven Jaret are thanked for their constructive reviews. Uwe Reimold is thanked for editorial handling. The Analytical, Environmental & Geo-Chemistry (AMGC) team at Vrije Universiteit Brussel is supported by Research Foundation Flanders (FWO; project G0A6517N) and the Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (BELSPO); P. Kaskes is an FWO Ph.D. fellow (project 11E6619N). V. Debaille acknowledges the European Research Council Starting Grant \u201CISo-SyC\u201D (Initial Solar System Composition and Early Planetary Differentiation) and Fund for Scientific Research (FRS-FNRS), Belgium, for funding. Debaille, Matielli, Claeys, and Goderis thank the Excellence of Science project \u201CET-HoME\u201D for support. The Vienna group (Feignon, Ferri\u00E8re, Koeberl) was partly supported by the University of Vienna doctoral school IK-1045 (principal investigator: C. Koeberl). Funding to Gulick and Ross was provided by U.S. National Science Foundation grant OCE-1737351. This is University of Texas Institute for Geophysics contribution 3690 and Center for Planetary Systems Habitability contribution 0016.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Geological Society of Amer. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - This study presents petrographic and geochemical characterization of 46 pre-impact rocks and 32 impactites containing and/or representing impact melt rock from the peak ring of the Chicxulub impact structure (Yucatán, Mexico). The aims were both to investigate the components that potentially contributed to the impact melt (i.e., the pre-impact lithologies) and to better elucidate impact melt rock emplacement at Chicxulub. The impactites presented here are subdivided into two sample groups: the lower impact melt rock−bearing unit, which intrudes the peak ring at different intervals, and the upper impact melt rock unit, which overlies the peak ring. The geochemical characterization of five identified pre-impact lithologies (i.e., granitoid, dolerite, dacite, felsite, and limestone) was able to constrain the bulk geochemical composition of both impactite units. These pre-impact lithologies thus likely represent the main constituent lithologies that were involved in the formation of impact melt rock. In general, the composition of both impactite units can be explained by mixing of the primarily felsic and mafic lithologies, but with varying degrees of carbonate dilution. It is assumed that the two units were initially part of the same impact-produced melt, but discrete processes separated them during crater formation. The lower impact melt rock−bearing unit is interpreted to represent impact melt rock injected into the crystalline basement during the compression/excavation stage of cratering. These impact melt rock layers acted as delamination surfaces within the crystalline basement, accommodating its displacement during peak ring formation. This movement strongly comminuted the impact melt rock layers present in the peak ring structure. The composition of the upper impact melt rock unit was contingent on the entrainment of carbonate components and is interpreted to have stayed at the surface during crater development. Its formation was not finalized until the modification stage, when carbonate material would have reentered the crater.
AB - This study presents petrographic and geochemical characterization of 46 pre-impact rocks and 32 impactites containing and/or representing impact melt rock from the peak ring of the Chicxulub impact structure (Yucatán, Mexico). The aims were both to investigate the components that potentially contributed to the impact melt (i.e., the pre-impact lithologies) and to better elucidate impact melt rock emplacement at Chicxulub. The impactites presented here are subdivided into two sample groups: the lower impact melt rock−bearing unit, which intrudes the peak ring at different intervals, and the upper impact melt rock unit, which overlies the peak ring. The geochemical characterization of five identified pre-impact lithologies (i.e., granitoid, dolerite, dacite, felsite, and limestone) was able to constrain the bulk geochemical composition of both impactite units. These pre-impact lithologies thus likely represent the main constituent lithologies that were involved in the formation of impact melt rock. In general, the composition of both impactite units can be explained by mixing of the primarily felsic and mafic lithologies, but with varying degrees of carbonate dilution. It is assumed that the two units were initially part of the same impact-produced melt, but discrete processes separated them during crater formation. The lower impact melt rock−bearing unit is interpreted to represent impact melt rock injected into the crystalline basement during the compression/excavation stage of cratering. These impact melt rock layers acted as delamination surfaces within the crystalline basement, accommodating its displacement during peak ring formation. This movement strongly comminuted the impact melt rock layers present in the peak ring structure. The composition of the upper impact melt rock unit was contingent on the entrainment of carbonate components and is interpreted to have stayed at the surface during crater development. Its formation was not finalized until the modification stage, when carbonate material would have reentered the crater.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125720004&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1130/B35795.1
DO - 10.1130/B35795.1
M3 - Article
VL - 134
SP - 293
EP - 315
JO - Geological Society of America Bulletin
JF - Geological Society of America Bulletin
SN - 0016-7606
IS - 1-2
ER -