Potentiality states: Quantum versus classical emergence

Diederik Aerts, Bart D'Hooghe

    Onderzoeksoutput: ChapterResearchpeer review

    Samenvatting

    We identify emergence with the existence of states of potentiality related to relevant physical quantities. We introduce the concept of 'potentiality state' operationally and show how it reduces to 'superposition state' when standard quantum mechanics can be applied. We consider several examples to illustrate our approach, and define the potentiality states giving rise to emergence in each example. We prove that Bell inequalities are violated by the potentiality states in the examples, which, taking into account Pitowsky's theorem, experimentally indicates the presence of quantum structure in emergence. In the first example emergence arises because of the many ways water can be subdivided into different vessels. In the second example, we put forward a full quantum description of the Liar paradox situation, and identify the potentiality states, which in this case turn out to be superposition states. In the example of the soccer team, we show the difference between classical emergence as stable dynamical pattern and emergence defined by a potentiality state, and show how Bell inequalities can be violated in the case of highly contextual experiments.
    Originele taal-2English
    TitelIn Worldviews, Science and Us: Bridging Knowledge and Its Implications for Our Perspectives of the World. Singapore: World Scientific
    RedacteurenD. Aerts, B. D'Hooge, N. Note
    UitgeverijWorld Scientific Publishing
    Pagina's314-333
    Aantal pagina's20
    ISBN van geprinte versie978-981-4383-07-3
    StatusPublished - 2011

    Publicatie series

    NaamWorldviews, Science and Us
    UitgeverijWorld Scientific

    Bibliografische nota

    D. Aerts, B. D'Hooghe, N. Note

    Vingerafdruk

    Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Potentiality states: Quantum versus classical emergence'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

    Citeer dit