Readers of the first edition of Newton's Principia on the relation between gravity, matter, and divine and natural causation: British public debates, 1687–1713

Steffen Ducheyne, Jip Van Besouw

Onderzoeksoutput: Articlepeer review

Samenvatting

In this article, we document how, in the public arena, British readers of the first edition of Isaac Newton's Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica (1687) tried to make sense of the relation between gravity, matter, and divine and natural causation—an issue on which Newton had remained entirely silent in the first edition of the Principia. We show that readers attached new meanings to the Principia so that parts of it migrated to a different intellectual debate. It will be shown that one particular result Newton obtained in the Principia, namely the rejection of a vacuum in Corollary 3 to Proposition 6 in Book 3, was the most important locus in debates on the relation between gravity, matter, and causation.
Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)381-395
Aantal pagina's15
TijdschriftCentaurus
Volume63
Nummer van het tijdschrift2
DOI's
StatusPublished - mei 2021

Bibliografische nota

Funding Information:
Special Research Fund, BOF, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Grant/Award Number: WT125; Flemish Research Foundation, FWO‐Vlaanderen, Grant/Award Number: Postdoctoral grant 1208220N Funding information

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Copyright:
Copyright 2022 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Readers of the first edition of Newton's Principia on the relation between gravity, matter, and divine and natural causation: British public debates, 1687–1713'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit