TY - JOUR
T1 - Relationship between health-related determinants and adherence to breast and colorectal cancer screening
T2 - a population-based study in Flanders, Belgium
AU - Ferrari, Allegra
AU - Tran, Thuy Ngan
AU - Hoeck, Sarah
AU - Peeters, Marc
AU - Goossens, Mathijs
AU - Van Hal, Guido
N1 - © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association.
PY - 2024/4/3
Y1 - 2024/4/3
N2 - BACKGROUND: Despite the recognized benefits of structured cancer screening, tests outside organized screening programs are common. Comprehensive reports on outside program screening in Europe are lacking, but the Flemish breast cancer (BC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs monitor data on non-organized tests prescribed by GPs and specialists.METHODS: Using data at aggregated level, logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between health care utilization and screening coverage in 308 Flemish municipalities during 2015-18.RESULTS: With regards to BC, municipalities with higher rates of gynecologists' visits had lower odds of coverage inside (-8%) and higher odds of coverage outside (+17%) the program. By contrast, municipalities with higher rates of GP visits, had higher odds of coverage inside (+6%) and lower odds of coverage outside (-7%) the program. As for CRC, municipalities with higher rates of visits gastroenterologists' visits had lower odds of coverage inside (-3%). Instead, municipalities with higher rates of GP visits, had higher odds of coverage both inside (+2%) and outside (+5%) the program. Municipalities with higher percentages of people with chronic conditions had higher odds of coverage within both the BC and CRC programs (+5% and +3%), and lower odds of outside screening (-7% and -6%). Municipalities with higher percentages of people 65+ with dementia and with mood disorders had, respectively, higher odds (+13% and +5%) and lower odds (-3% and -4%) of coverage inside both the BC and CRC programs.CONCLUSION: Our findings underscore the impact of healthcare utilization on cancer screening coverage at the municipal level in Flanders.
AB - BACKGROUND: Despite the recognized benefits of structured cancer screening, tests outside organized screening programs are common. Comprehensive reports on outside program screening in Europe are lacking, but the Flemish breast cancer (BC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs monitor data on non-organized tests prescribed by GPs and specialists.METHODS: Using data at aggregated level, logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between health care utilization and screening coverage in 308 Flemish municipalities during 2015-18.RESULTS: With regards to BC, municipalities with higher rates of gynecologists' visits had lower odds of coverage inside (-8%) and higher odds of coverage outside (+17%) the program. By contrast, municipalities with higher rates of GP visits, had higher odds of coverage inside (+6%) and lower odds of coverage outside (-7%) the program. As for CRC, municipalities with higher rates of visits gastroenterologists' visits had lower odds of coverage inside (-3%). Instead, municipalities with higher rates of GP visits, had higher odds of coverage both inside (+2%) and outside (+5%) the program. Municipalities with higher percentages of people with chronic conditions had higher odds of coverage within both the BC and CRC programs (+5% and +3%), and lower odds of outside screening (-7% and -6%). Municipalities with higher percentages of people 65+ with dementia and with mood disorders had, respectively, higher odds (+13% and +5%) and lower odds (-3% and -4%) of coverage inside both the BC and CRC programs.CONCLUSION: Our findings underscore the impact of healthcare utilization on cancer screening coverage at the municipal level in Flanders.
KW - Humans
KW - Female
KW - Early Detection of Cancer
KW - Belgium/epidemiology
KW - Mass Screening
KW - Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis
KW - Patient Acceptance of Health Care
KW - Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85189665029&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/eurpub/ckad206
DO - 10.1093/eurpub/ckad206
M3 - Article
C2 - 38006217
SN - 1101-1262
VL - 34
SP - 347
EP - 353
JO - European Journal of Public Health
JF - European Journal of Public Health
IS - 2
ER -