Subclinical Myocardial Dysfunction in Patients with Persistent Dyspnea One Year after COVID-19-Why Should Screening for Cardiovascular Diseases Be Performed? Reply to Vankrunkelsven, P. Tendentious Paper-Titles and Wrong Conclusions Lead to Fear in the Population and Medical Overconsumption. Comment on "Luchian et al. Subclinical Myocardial Dysfunction in Patients with Persistent Dyspnea One Year after COVID-19. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 57"

Onderzoeksoutput: Articlepeer review

1 Citaat (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

We have read with interest the comment by Vankrunkelsven P. [...].

Originele taal-2English
Artikelnummer1837
Pagina's (van-tot)1-3
Aantal pagina's3
TijdschriftDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
Volume12
Nummer van het tijdschrift8
DOI's
StatusPublished - aug 2022

Bibliografische nota

Funding Information:
This work was supported by grant from the research center for Nanocatalysis funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Republic of Korea.

Copyright:
Copyright 2023 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Subclinical Myocardial Dysfunction in Patients with Persistent Dyspnea One Year after COVID-19-Why Should Screening for Cardiovascular Diseases Be Performed? Reply to Vankrunkelsven, P. Tendentious Paper-Titles and Wrong Conclusions Lead to Fear in the Population and Medical Overconsumption. Comment on "Luchian et al. Subclinical Myocardial Dysfunction in Patients with Persistent Dyspnea One Year after COVID-19. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 57"'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit