TY - JOUR
T1 - The benefits of being a multi-capital: The economic impact of the international and European institutions and interest groups.
AU - Dotti, Nicola
AU - Spithoven, Andre
AU - Ysebaert, Walter
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors are grateful to the Brussels Commissariat for Europe and International Organisations (Alain Hutchinson, Karin Impens and Edoardo Guglielmetti) and Aina Astudillo Fernandez, Dries Cuyvers, Amynah Gangji and Mattéo Godin of the Brussels Institute for Statistics and Analysis (BISA/IBSA) for their support. The authors are also grateful to Magdalena Sapała from the European Research parliament Service (EPRS) for the detailed information on the EU Budget. The authors thank the Editor and anonymous referees who kindly reviewed the earlier version of this article and provided valuable suggestions and comments. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This publication is part of a research project funded by the Brussels Commissariat for Europe and International Organisations.
Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This publication is part of a research project funded by the Brussels Commissariat for Europe and International Organisations.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - Brussels is known worldwide for hosting (most of) the European institutions as well as several other international organisations like North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). Besides the symbolic political value, their presence has an economic impact because of their administrative activities and staff remunerations. Estimating the economic impact poses two main challenges. First, the supranational nature of these organisations makes it challenging to quantify the size of these institutions and related bodies because country-based statistical systems hardly account for transnational organisations. Second, as these institutions and organisations mainly rely on taxpayers’ funding, policymakers need transparent estimates to assess the implications of their decisions as well as for a matter of accountability. For these purposes, a meticulous data collection is carried out, and transparent assumptions are used to estimate the local economic multiplier effect of these activities accounting for operational expenditures, employees’ consumption as well as (Belgian) taxes and saving. The results show that the economic impact for the Brussels-Capital Region lies between 23% and 26% of regional turnover and 19% and 20% of employment, while interregional spillovers are estimated being around 1.5% to 1.7% of regional turnover and 0.6% to 0.7% of employment for both Flemish and Walloon regions.
AB - Brussels is known worldwide for hosting (most of) the European institutions as well as several other international organisations like North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). Besides the symbolic political value, their presence has an economic impact because of their administrative activities and staff remunerations. Estimating the economic impact poses two main challenges. First, the supranational nature of these organisations makes it challenging to quantify the size of these institutions and related bodies because country-based statistical systems hardly account for transnational organisations. Second, as these institutions and organisations mainly rely on taxpayers’ funding, policymakers need transparent estimates to assess the implications of their decisions as well as for a matter of accountability. For these purposes, a meticulous data collection is carried out, and transparent assumptions are used to estimate the local economic multiplier effect of these activities accounting for operational expenditures, employees’ consumption as well as (Belgian) taxes and saving. The results show that the economic impact for the Brussels-Capital Region lies between 23% and 26% of regional turnover and 19% and 20% of employment, while interregional spillovers are estimated being around 1.5% to 1.7% of regional turnover and 0.6% to 0.7% of employment for both Flemish and Walloon regions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115611457&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/09697764211044090
DO - 10.1177/09697764211044090
M3 - Article
SN - 0969-7764
VL - 29
SP - 255
EP - 277
JO - European Urban and Regional Studies
JF - European Urban and Regional Studies
IS - 2
ER -