TY - JOUR
T1 - The ecological and evolutionary dynamics of inselbergs
AU - Vanschoenwinkel, Bram
AU - de Paula, Luiza F.A.
AU - Snoeks, Joren M.
AU - Van der Stocken, Tom
AU - Buschke, Falko T.
AU - Porembski, Stefan
AU - Silveira, Fernando A.O.
N1 - Funding Information:
B.V. is grateful to Brian Timms, Maitland Seaman, Merlijn Jocqu\u00E9, Luc Brendonck and Tom Pinceel for various discussions on different aspects of inselberg ecosystems. L. d. P. acknowledges the postdoctoral scholarship from Coordena\u00E7\u00E3o de Aperfei\u00E7oamento de Pessoal de N\u00EDvel Superior (CAPES; No: 88887.877772/2023\u201000) and project funding from the Funda\u00E7\u00E3o de Amparo \u00E0 Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG; No: APQ\u201002049\u201021). Kim Roelants helped to strengthen some of the evolutionary sections of the manuscript. Sofie Van Daele contributed to the development of inselberg artwork. This paper was partly supported by VLIR UOS project SERIAL via a South Initiative Grant (No: ZA2019SIN261A105) from the Flemish Interuniversity Research Council (VLIR\u2010UOS), FWO project (No: FWO 12F0719N) from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) and by the EU ERA\u2010NET\u2010Cofund BiodivRestore project ResPond. Thais Vasconcelos and an anonymous reviewer provided many valuable suggestions during the peer\u2010review process.
Funding Information:
B.V. is grateful to Brian Timms, Maitland Seaman, Merlijn Jocqu\u00E9, Luc Brendonck and Tom Pinceel for various discussions on different aspects of inselberg ecosystems. L. d. P. acknowledges the postdoctoral scholarship from Coordena\u00E7\u00E3o de Aperfei\u00E7oamento de Pessoal de N\u00EDvel Superior (CAPES; No: 88887.877772/2023-00) and project funding from the Funda\u00E7\u00E3o de Amparo \u00E0 Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG; No: APQ-02049-21). Kim Roelants helped to strengthen some of the evolutionary sections of the manuscript. Sofie Van Daele contributed to the development of inselberg artwork. This paper was partly supported by VLIR UOS project SERIAL via a South Initiative Grant (No: ZA2019SIN261A105) from the Flemish Interuniversity Research Council (VLIR-UOS), FWO project (No: FWO 12F0719N) from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) and by the EU ERA-NET-Cofund BiodivRestore project ResPond. Thais Vasconcelos and an anonymous reviewer provided many valuable suggestions during the peer-review process.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Cambridge Philosophical Society.
PY - 2024/10/1
Y1 - 2024/10/1
N2 - Islands are fundamental model systems in ecology, biogeography, and evolutionary biology. However, terrestrial islands, unlike their aquatic counterparts, have received comparatively less attention. Among these land islands, inselbergs (i.e. isolated rock outcrops with diverse lithologies and a modest topographical prominence) stand out as iconic examples distributed worldwide across global biomes. Due to their durable lithology, inselbergs change slowly, persisting for tens of millions of years. In this review, we propose a biological definition for inselbergs that captures three fundamental characteristics of inselbergs from the perspective of biota. These are old age, isolation and the presence of unique microhabitats that are rare or absent in the surrounding matrix, fostering distinct communities often with unique and endemic biota. We synthesise the state of the art and formulate a set of testable hypotheses to deepen our understanding of the origins and maintenance of diversity on inselbergs, which are increasingly exposed to anthropogenic threats. By offering different habitats compared to the surrounding habitat matrix (e.g. moist microhabitats in dryland landscapes and xeric environments in humid tropical landscapes), inselbergs may allow specific lineages to thrive beyond their typical geographical limits. Particularly in drylands and degraded landscapes, inselbergs may not just provide different habitats but also act as ecological refuges or evolutionary refugia by providing a wider range of potential microhabitats than the surrounding matrix, enhancing resilience and promoting regional biodiversity. The central role of the matrix ensures that the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of inselbergs differ from those of true islands such as oceanic islands. Given that inselberg biota coexist within a terrestrial matrix, interactions between inselberg and matrix populations impact each other significantly. Over evolutionary timescales, matrix species may contract to inselberg refugia, preserving lineages while cycles of isolation and reconnection may drive speciation via a species pump. Although inselberg biodiversity has been studied predominantly from an island biogeography perspective, we argue that depending on the spatial scale, habitat specificity and mobility of the organisms considered, a range of different theories and paradigms can help explain the biogeography and local distribution patterns of different taxonomic and functional groups of inselberg species.
AB - Islands are fundamental model systems in ecology, biogeography, and evolutionary biology. However, terrestrial islands, unlike their aquatic counterparts, have received comparatively less attention. Among these land islands, inselbergs (i.e. isolated rock outcrops with diverse lithologies and a modest topographical prominence) stand out as iconic examples distributed worldwide across global biomes. Due to their durable lithology, inselbergs change slowly, persisting for tens of millions of years. In this review, we propose a biological definition for inselbergs that captures three fundamental characteristics of inselbergs from the perspective of biota. These are old age, isolation and the presence of unique microhabitats that are rare or absent in the surrounding matrix, fostering distinct communities often with unique and endemic biota. We synthesise the state of the art and formulate a set of testable hypotheses to deepen our understanding of the origins and maintenance of diversity on inselbergs, which are increasingly exposed to anthropogenic threats. By offering different habitats compared to the surrounding habitat matrix (e.g. moist microhabitats in dryland landscapes and xeric environments in humid tropical landscapes), inselbergs may allow specific lineages to thrive beyond their typical geographical limits. Particularly in drylands and degraded landscapes, inselbergs may not just provide different habitats but also act as ecological refuges or evolutionary refugia by providing a wider range of potential microhabitats than the surrounding matrix, enhancing resilience and promoting regional biodiversity. The central role of the matrix ensures that the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of inselbergs differ from those of true islands such as oceanic islands. Given that inselberg biota coexist within a terrestrial matrix, interactions between inselberg and matrix populations impact each other significantly. Over evolutionary timescales, matrix species may contract to inselberg refugia, preserving lineages while cycles of isolation and reconnection may drive speciation via a species pump. Although inselberg biodiversity has been studied predominantly from an island biogeography perspective, we argue that depending on the spatial scale, habitat specificity and mobility of the organisms considered, a range of different theories and paradigms can help explain the biogeography and local distribution patterns of different taxonomic and functional groups of inselberg species.
KW - biogeography
KW - Bornhardt
KW - ecology
KW - endemism
KW - evolution
KW - inselberg
KW - island biogeography theory
KW - island-like habitat
KW - monolith
KW - outcrop
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205300124&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/brv.13150
DO - 10.1111/brv.13150
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85205300124
SN - 1464-7931
VL - 100
SP - 481
EP - 507
JO - Biological Reviews
JF - Biological Reviews
IS - 2
ER -