Unificatory Understanding and Explanatory Proofs

Onderzoeksoutput: Article

1 Citaat (Scopus)


One of the central aims of the philosophical analysis of mathematical explanation is to determine how one can distinguish explanatory proofs from non-explanatory proofs. In this paper, I take a closer look at the current status of the debate, and what the challenges for the philosophical analysis of explanatory proofs are. In order to provide an answer to these challenges, I suggest we start from analysing the concept understanding. More precisely, I will defend four claims: (1) understanding is a condition for explanation, (2) unificatory understanding is a type of explanatory understanding, (3) unificatory understanding is valuable in mathematics, and (4) mathematical proofs can contribute to unificatory understanding. As a result, in a context where the epistemic aim is to unify mathematical results, I argue it is fruitful to make a distinction between proofs based on their explanatory value.
Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)1105-1127
Aantal pagina's23
TijdschriftFoundations of Science
Vroegere onlinedatum28 feb 2020
StatusPublished - 2 nov 2021


Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Unificatory Understanding and Explanatory Proofs'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit