TY - JOUR
T1 - Urbanization drives cross-taxon declines in abundance and diversity at multiple spatial scales
AU - Piano, Elena
AU - Souffreau, Caroline
AU - Merckx, Thomas
AU - Baardsen, Lisa F.
AU - Backeljau, Thierry
AU - Bonte, Dries
AU - Brans, Kristien I.
AU - Cours, Marie
AU - Dahirel, Maxime
AU - Debortoli, Nicolas
AU - Decaestecker, Ellen
AU - De Wolf, Katrien
AU - Engelen, Jessie M.T.
AU - Fontaneto, Diego
AU - Gianuca, Andros T.
AU - Govaert, Lynn
AU - Hanashiro, Fabio T.T.
AU - Higuti, Janet
AU - Lens, Luc
AU - Martens, Koen
AU - Matheve, Hans
AU - Matthysen, Erik
AU - Pinseel, Eveline
AU - Sablon, Rose
AU - Schön, Isa
AU - Stoks, Robby
AU - Van Doninck, Karine
AU - Van Dyck, Hans
AU - Vanormelingen, Pieter
AU - Van Wichelen, Jeroen
AU - Vyverman, Wim
AU - De Meester, Luc
AU - Hendrickx, Frederik
N1 - © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - The increasing urbanization process is hypothesized to drastically alter (semi-)natural environments with a concomitant major decline in species abundance and diversity. Yet, studies on this effect of urbanization, and the spatial scale at which it acts, are at present inconclusive due to the large heterogeneity in taxonomic groups and spatial scales at which this relationship has been investigated among studies. Comprehensive studies analysing this relationship across multiple animal groups and at multiple spatial scales are rare, hampering the assessment of how biodiversity generally responds to urbanization. We studied aquatic (cladocerans), limno-terrestrial (bdelloid rotifers) and terrestrial (butterflies, ground beetles, ground- and web spiders, macro-moths, orthopterans and snails) invertebrate groups using a hierarchical spatial design, wherein three local-scale (200 m × 200 m) urbanization levels were repeatedly sampled across three landscape-scale (3 km × 3 km) urbanization levels. We tested for local and landscape urbanization effects on abundance and species richness of each group, whereby total richness was partitioned into the average richness of local communities and the richness due to variation among local communities. Abundances of the terrestrial active dispersers declined in response to local urbanization, with reductions up to 85% for butterflies, while passive dispersers did not show any clear trend. Species richness also declined with increasing levels of urbanization, but responses were highly heterogeneous among the different groups with respect to the richness component and the spatial scale at which urbanization impacts richness. Depending on the group, species richness declined due to biotic homogenization and/or local species loss. This resulted in an overall decrease in total richness across groups in urban areas. These results provide strong support to the general negative impact of urbanization on abundance and species richness within habitat patches and highlight the importance of considering multiple spatial scales and taxa to assess the impacts of urbanization on biodiversity.
AB - The increasing urbanization process is hypothesized to drastically alter (semi-)natural environments with a concomitant major decline in species abundance and diversity. Yet, studies on this effect of urbanization, and the spatial scale at which it acts, are at present inconclusive due to the large heterogeneity in taxonomic groups and spatial scales at which this relationship has been investigated among studies. Comprehensive studies analysing this relationship across multiple animal groups and at multiple spatial scales are rare, hampering the assessment of how biodiversity generally responds to urbanization. We studied aquatic (cladocerans), limno-terrestrial (bdelloid rotifers) and terrestrial (butterflies, ground beetles, ground- and web spiders, macro-moths, orthopterans and snails) invertebrate groups using a hierarchical spatial design, wherein three local-scale (200 m × 200 m) urbanization levels were repeatedly sampled across three landscape-scale (3 km × 3 km) urbanization levels. We tested for local and landscape urbanization effects on abundance and species richness of each group, whereby total richness was partitioned into the average richness of local communities and the richness due to variation among local communities. Abundances of the terrestrial active dispersers declined in response to local urbanization, with reductions up to 85% for butterflies, while passive dispersers did not show any clear trend. Species richness also declined with increasing levels of urbanization, but responses were highly heterogeneous among the different groups with respect to the richness component and the spatial scale at which urbanization impacts richness. Depending on the group, species richness declined due to biotic homogenization and/or local species loss. This resulted in an overall decrease in total richness across groups in urban areas. These results provide strong support to the general negative impact of urbanization on abundance and species richness within habitat patches and highlight the importance of considering multiple spatial scales and taxa to assess the impacts of urbanization on biodiversity.
KW - biodiversity
KW - biotic homogenization
KW - diversity partitioning
KW - insect decline
KW - land use
KW - spatial scale
KW - urban ecology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077875744&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/gcb.14934
DO - 10.1111/gcb.14934
M3 - Article
C2 - 31755626
AN - SCOPUS:85077875744
SN - 1354-1013
VL - 26
SP - 1196
EP - 1211
JO - Global Change Biology
JF - Global Change Biology
IS - 3
ER -