Validation of the AUDIT and AUDIT-C for Hazardous Drinking in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Yannic van Gils, Erik Franck, Eva Dierckx, Sebastiaan P J van Alphen, John B Saunders, Geert Dom

Onderzoeksoutput: Articlepeer review

34 Citaten (Scopus)
50 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

BACKGROUND: One of the best-known tools in screening for hazardous drinking is the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and its abbreviated form, the AUDIT-C. The aim of the present study is to determine the cut-offs of both instruments in identifying hazardous drinking in older adults.

METHOD: A sample of 1577 older adults completed a questionnaire regarding alcohol behavior. Hazardous drinking was defined as drinking >10 units/week. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves of AUDIT and AUDIT-C were calculated and cut-off scores were derived.

RESULTS: Respectively 27.3% and 12.3% of older men and women drank >10 units/week. For the AUDIT the best trade-off between sensitivity and specificity was using a cut-off of ≥5 for men and ≥4 for women, which yielded in men sensitivity and specificity values respectively of 80.7% and 81.3% and in women 100% and 71.7%, respectively. We found the AUDIT-C to perform well with an optimal cut-off of ≥5 for men and ≥4 for women, which generated in men sensitivity and specificity values respectively of 76.5% and 85.3% and in women 100% and 74.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: The AUDIT-C is accurate and sufficient in screening for hazardous drinking in community-dwelling older adults if the cut-offs are tailored by gender.

Originele taal-2English
Artikelnummer9266
Aantal pagina's10
TijdschriftInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Volume18
Nummer van het tijdschrift17
DOI's
StatusPublished - 2 sep. 2021

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Validation of the AUDIT and AUDIT-C for Hazardous Drinking in Community-Dwelling Older Adults'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit