Samenvatting
It is suggested that teachers work from a gender-blind position (Garrahy, 2001): teachers claim not to interact any differently with boys than with girls. However an examination of the literature base on gender imbalances in student-teacher interaction shows - at times contradicting - unequal interaction patterns for boys and girls (e.g. Beaman, Wheldall & Kemp, 2006; Jones & Dindia, 2004). Several studies emphasize the need to further investigate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at raising teachers' awareness and reflection on gender related interaction (e.g. Myhill, 2002). The results of two studies in a mixed methods research are presented. First, video stimulated recall interviews with thirteen secondary education teachers are used to investigate teachers’ gendered thoughts, images and emotions during teaching. Videotaped lessons are analysed from both the researcher as the teachers’ own perspective to help teachers become aware of possible gender bias. Second, the actual interactions between students and teachers are investigated by means of quantitative analysis of students’ classroom interaction patterns (N=180) in video-taped lessons. Analyses of the data show (a) that teachers’ implicit thoughts are negatively biased towards boys, (b) boys report significantly higher levels of feeling discriminated against and (c) boys receive significantly more negative feedback from their teachers than girls. Part of this increased level of negative feedback appears to be justified because boys are more off-task and call out to the teacher more often. We also find evidence, however, for teachers being more lenient towards girls: girls and boys talk to their neighbors equally and only boys receive negative feedback for this. Finally, (d) video stimulated recall interviewing proved to be a promising method to raise teacher awareness of these gendered thoughts and behaviors with half of the respondents becoming aware of unfair student treatments. Suggestions for using video-stimulated recall in teacher professional development and teacher education programs are discussed.
| Originele taal-2 | English |
|---|---|
| Status | Unpublished - 2016 |
| Evenement | AtGender Spring Conference 2016 - Utrecht University, Utrecht , Netherlands Duur: 21 apr. 2016 → 23 apr. 2016 |
Conference
| Conference | AtGender Spring Conference 2016 |
|---|---|
| Land/Regio | Netherlands |
| Stad | Utrecht |
| Periode | 21/04/16 → 23/04/16 |
Vingerafdruk
Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Videography: investigating gendered teacher-student classroom interactions and raising teacher awareness of implicit gender bias'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.Projecten
- 2 Afgelopen
-
FWOTM773: De constructie en evolutie van jonge adolescenten hun sekse rol attitudes: individuele, thuis en school-gerelateerde determinanten en de relatie met schoolse prestaties en klasgedrag van leerlingen.
Engels, N. (Administrative Promotor), Struyven, K. (Co-Promoter) & Halimi, M. (Mandataris)
1/10/15 → 30/09/19
Project: Fundamenteel
-
IWT550: Teaching in the bed of Procrustes – Effectiveness of gender-sensitive strategies with regard to academic achievement, school retardation, unqualified drop-out, the motivation to learn and the aspirations of youngsters in secondary education.
Lombaerts, K. (Administrative Promotor), Engels, N. (Wetenschappelijk Promoter), Van Houtte, M. (Co-Promoter) & Laevers, F. (Coördinator)
1/01/12 → 31/12/15
Project: Fundamenteel
Activiteiten
- 1 Talk or presentation at a conference
-
ATGender Spring Conference 2016
Halimi, M. (Speaker), Consuegra, E. (Speaker) & Engels, N. (Contributor)
22 apr. 2016Activiteit: Talk or presentation at a conference
Citeer dit
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver